The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 08:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
1. travel
2. PC
3. No travel, yes foul
4. flop and No call
5. good screen
6. no call
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
4. flop and No call
Here we go again with the flop nonsense.

If that's not displacement, nothing is.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:16am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
1) barely can see what happened. Definitely nothing to learn from this play

2) what are we debating on this play?

3) ??? I see a POE foul.

4) PC followed by a travel.

5) I think the official guessed on this play based on the embellishment of the player who was screened.

6) I don't think the official sees the whole play and the defender embellishes contact.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by griblets View Post
Here we go again with the flop nonsense.

If that's not displacement, nothing is.
The angle the offensive player was moving and where the defender was does not explain the level of contact. The defender was also moving back and I don't see that as a PC foul. Contact was minimal its a nocall, and embellishment by the defender.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 11:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
The angle the offensive player was moving and where the defender was does not explain the level of contact. The defender was also moving back and I don't see that as a PC foul. Contact was minimal its a nocall, and embellishment by the defender.
This is not minimal contact nor embellishment. The defender's body changes direction while his feet are off the ground when contact occurs. It is not possible to change body direction while airborne without application of an external force. See video around the 0:25 mark for the defender's feet, and then 0:34 for the external force, W15's right shoulder in the sternum of the defender as W15 jumps into the defender.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 11:43am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Play 1: Can't tell. Probably held ball or nothing.

Play 2: Block at that level.

Play 3: No travel, foul.

Play 4: Offensive foul

Play 5: Nothing

Play 6: Offensive foul
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
That contact is not a PC, no matter how many times I watch it. The offensive player is moving east/west and the defender is not. The onus of that contact is on the defense. I have a no call. Travel, maybe. In real life I may not see that travel.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
1. Inconclusive. I can't see with high certainty in the video how much, if any, the defender prevented the release. It really needed a view from a different angle to be sure.
2. PC...defender was legal long before contact, shooter when through him
3. Seems like a basic handcheck to me
4. Block, defender moving into the path of an airborne opponent and toward white at the time of contact. Even if it was somewhat backward, the airborne component of the play prevents the defender from moving into his path at that time. It was a travel, but I'm not going with that since the contact may have contributed to the travel. Must go with the foul. No shot since it occurred before the shooter was on the way up for a shot.
5. Fooled the referee....no foul occurred.
6. Holding foul on the defender....which caused the reaction from the offensive player which drew the offensive foul call. No call OK but NOT an offensive foul.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Wed Mar 18, 2015 at 01:58pm.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 12:48pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
... Travel, maybe. In real life I may not see that travel.
Why not? You can't determine his pivot foot?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Why not? You can't determine his pivot foot?
It's a tough one with the potential contact, the gathering. It's a very quick potential travel, not very black/white that's why.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
1) no way to know without closer angle, but looks like a travel
2) again, bad angle but looks like a block
3) ?? not sure what we are even talking about
4) PC, defender has LGP and moves to maintain it, offensive player goes through his chest. Followed by a travel
5) no call.
6) this is not a good call. its a no call.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 02:03pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
I know after seeing plenty of plays this year where players (mainly defenders) are embellishing the amount of contact (or straight up faking being fouled), this off-season I'm going to be working on seeing entire plays before putting whistles on them.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 02:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 144
Am I the only one that sees the screen in #5 as illegal for not respecting the time and distance principle?
__________________
There are two kinds of actuaries: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data...
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathReferee View Post
Am I the only one that sees the screen in #5 as illegal for not respecting the time and distance principle?
Huh? this is not an off ball blind side screen.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 18, 2015, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathReferee View Post
Am I the only one that sees the screen in #5 as illegal for not respecting the time and distance principle?
You are not. I agree that time and distance was not allowed, thus the screen is illegal. I thought it was an excellent call.


Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Huh? this is not an off ball blind side screen.
I don't see anything in Rule 4-40 (NFHS) that distinguishes screens between "off ball" and "on ball."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Notre Dame/Clemson (Video) bballref3966 Basketball 19 Thu Feb 19, 2015 01:14am
Duke at Notre Dame (Video) JRutledge Basketball 41 Mon Feb 02, 2015 03:16pm
NC State -- Notre Dame end of regulation (Video) JMUplayer Basketball 8 Tue Jan 27, 2015 02:58am
Uconn v Notre Dame NCAAW Mechanics (Video) RefCT Basketball 4 Mon Dec 08, 2014 12:16pm
Louisville @ Notre Dame, Rich's Video Request #2 JetMetFan Basketball 42 Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1