NCAAW Cases

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Thanks for asking. I still don't understand how the AR208 ruling is consistent with the other rulings in that section. For example, if the clock is at 29, properly starts, runs to 18 -- we just chalk it up to an official's error. Since we can determine that it was more than 10, why don't we reset with a violation, like we do in AR208?

Without asking Jon again I would say AR 208 is a timing error. The other example - pardon the grammar - is an "us" error for not calling the violation, just as it would be if we saw a travel but didn't put a whistle on it.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Thanks for asking. I still don't understand how the AR208 ruling is consistent with the other rulings in that section. For example, if the clock is at 29, properly starts, runs to 18 -- we just chalk it up to an official's error. Since we can determine that it was more than 10, why don't we reset with a violation, like we do in AR208?

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

Without asking Jon again I would say AR 208 is a timing error. The other example - pardon the grammar - is an "us" error for not calling the violation, just as it would be if we saw a travel but didn't put a whistle on it.

On the men's side, we are to retroactively correct such missed 10 second violations and put the correct time back on the clock.