NCAA Men's Potential Rule changes

#10 (permalink)

Sun May 11, 2014, 09:41am

Rich

Get away from me, Steve.

Join Date: Aug 2000

Posts: 15,794

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

It is so poorly written that it could mean that player with LGP could not move backwards without being charged with a blocking foul. There really nothing wrong with the way guarding was defined prior to the 2013-14 season.

MTD, Sr.

It may be what they want, though. Once A1 is airborne, B2 must be still. Maybe it's poorly written, maybe it's an effort to eliminate flopping, maybe they just want their players to "take it". Who knows?

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Inspired Question on Potential Elbow Rule Change	BillyMac	Basketball	0	Sat Mar 02, 2013 07:20am
Potential for a big mess....	Andy	Softball	36	Tue Apr 12, 2011 06:31pm
Potential litigation?	fullor30	Basketball	14	Sun Jan 17, 2010 02:30pm
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test	ljudge	Football	2	Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am
Potential new official?	26 Year Gap	Basketball	4	Tue Feb 05, 2008 06:11am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42am.