The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:15pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKOFL View Post
thanks. so you can upgrade to a F1, F2, or Tech upon review?
You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:18pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.
Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:23pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.
You are right. I was only trying to reference what you call the foul. Any dead ball contact foul is a T. You could have called it based on FF1 or FF2, but they still would have been Ts.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.
2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Wow, today's colour commentators are making Billy Packer look good.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.
Was that the arm bar call on the strip of the ball? Looked like the right call to me at first glance...

Greg Anthony's critique of the officiating is getting old.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.
He got beat, stepped and leaned sideways into the shooter. I thought that was an easy block call.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:50pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.
Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 11:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?
Or the one against Lee when Kaminsky slammed into him?

There were a number of head-scratcher blocks on both sides.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 06, 2014, 12:09am
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.

In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 06, 2014, 12:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.
And now all the youngin's have the rest of the story!
Thanks for the post.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Goaltending?

Close goaltending no-call at 16:36 in second half. Would love to get another look at it. Was on its downward flight, appeared to be above the ring, but not sure it had the possibility of entering the basket.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 06, 2014, 12:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
Close goaltending no-call at 16:36 in second half. Would love to get another look at it. Was on its downward flight, appeared to be above the ring, but not sure it had the possibility of entering the basket.
I thought it was a good call. Unless it is grossly off (it wasn't), I don't think any official would rule that it has no chance of going in.

EDIT: My comments were about the other GT was called.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Sun Apr 06, 2014 at 01:20pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wisconsin/PSU Rich Basketball 1 Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:22am
Kentucky - UConn (or Uconn - Kentucky) Conversation bob jenkins Basketball 24 Mon Apr 04, 2011 08:20pm
Wisconsin v WSU Game Suudy Football 4 Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:46am
Wisconsin officials wisref2 Football 2 Fri Oct 14, 2005 09:49am
Wisconsin LDUB Baseball 5 Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1