Wisconsin / Kentucky

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.

Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Adam

Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.

You are right. I was only trying to reference what you call the foul. Any dead ball contact foul is a T. You could have called it based on FF1 or FF2, but they still would have been Ts.

Peace

[Nevadaref]

1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.
2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.

[Nevadaref]

Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.

[canuckrefguy]

Wow, today's colour commentators are making Billy Packer look good.

[Nevadaref]

5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.

[bballref3966]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.

Was that the arm bar call on the strip of the ball? Looked like the right call to me at first glance...

Greg Anthony's critique of the officiating is getting old.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bballref3966

Was that the arm bar call on the strip of the ball? Looked like the right call to me at first glance...

Greg Anthony's critique of the officiating is getting old.

No, the next one. Although I didn't care for the whistle on that strip either.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.

He got beat, stepped and leaned sideways into the shooter. I thought that was an easy block call.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.

Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Adam

Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?

Or the one against Lee when Kaminsky slammed into him?

There were a number of head-scratcher blocks on both sides.

[just another ref]

But, luckily we had a detailed, thorough, scientific analysis of the whole thing.

"I don't see how you can guard anybody in the post if they're not going to let you wrestle a little bit."

Rex Chapman

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Or the one against Lee when Kaminsky slammed into him?

There were a number of head-scratcher blocks on both sides.

He was just being consistent with the blocking calls they made earlier. I knew it was gonna be called a block as soon as I heard the whistle.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.

In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.

And now all the youngin's have the rest of the story!
Thanks for the post.