Tenn vs Michigan (Video)

[Nevadaref]

I don't like the PC call. Only contact was with the legs and lower body.
Tough angle for Dave Hall. He couldn't see the left shoulder of the offensive player.

Another monitor review for OOB with 2.9 secs left.

[JRutledge]

I have no problem with the PC call. Threw his shoulder and body into a legal defender. And even IMO and embellishment, but you still should call if the contact is there. The contact was there.

Peace

[MechanicGuy]

I think the crew had a rough game all around. I thought two of the foul calls on Maymon (2nd and 4th...one of which the OP may be questioning), and they might have blown two different OOB video reviews.

The "big" PC at the end could've gone either way.

And FWIW, the ball stayed in bounds...so if the options are PC or no-call, the PC helped Tennessee.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by MechanicGuy

I think the crew had a rough game all around. I thought two of the foul calls on Maymon (2nd and 4th...one of which the OP may be questioning),

The 4th foul on Maymon was harsh. Big man moving and contact is made with his chest.

Originally Posted by MechanicGuy

and they might have blown two different OOB video reviews.

Got the first one wrong, got the second one right.

[Larks]

[Nevadaref]

Someone posting worse video than jeremy!

[Larks]

Eh, its been a while between posts....

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Someone posting worse video than jeremy!

And as bad as jump stop.

[Larks]

wow...when I started here, video wasnt even possible....my bad

#spoiled

[zm1283]

Thought the PC at the end was a flop.

[bballref3966]

Originally Posted by zm1283

Thought the PC at the end was a flop.

He may have embellished a little, but there was still contact. The mere fact that a player flops does not mean a foul/contact has not occurred. Clearly there was contact and in David Hall's judgment, the contact displaced the legal defender enough to call a foul.

No problem with this call, also wouldn't have had a problem with a no-call.