Fastbreak Foul (Video)

[APG]

I'm going flagrant foul/FF2 on this.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by APG

I'm going flagrant foul/FF2 on this.

You beat me to it. I saw before the edit.

Peace

[MD Longhorn]

FF2 - go away now, kid.

[Rich]

Flagrant / FF2.

[rockyroad]

Flagrant...FF2 in NCAA. Bye-bye...

Initial contact was a hit to the shooters face/head. No way we can just go INT on that kind of play.

[j51969]

Eject, Eject, Eject. This is a no brainer for me. You leave this kid in and you are asking for retaliation. Even if the video makes it look worse than it was the violent nature of his action, and intent would do it for me. Does anyone know what if they went with intentional or upgraded to flagrant?

[Camron Rust]

No less than Int/FF1...possibly more depending on factors leading up to that.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by j51969

Eject, Eject, Eject. This is a no brainer for me. You leave this kid in and you are asking for retaliation. Even if the video makes it look worse than it was the violent nature of his action, and intent would do it for me. Does anyone know what if they went with intentional or upgraded to flagrant?

You could have retaliation anyway. That should not be just our decision making process. And that is why I would like to know what kind of game we have had up until that point. It might be a flagrant, but I am not seeing anything alone that suggest the player was not trying to play the ball or make a basketball play. It was not great, but sometimes players make bad plays, does not mean it is savage in nature that requires an ejection. Then again I would not be mad at someone for an ejection, it just would not be my first choice based only on what I witnessed here.

Peace