The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Iowa State-Oklahoma Block/Charge (video)

Thoughts?


__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:15am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
I am not so sure this is a block/charge play. It looks like this might have been called for more verticality purposes, then a block or charge being considered. That being said if this was a block/charge play, then I have a no call. But it is hard to tell without some indication of the signal from the official at the table.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,081
I have no call. Defender was legal, outside the RA and even jumped to defend the goal.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:46am
Stubborn Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,517
I'm with JRut.

I don't see a block or a charge. Contact doesn't necessarily mean a foul should be called. People will tell you basketball is not a contact sport, to which I say "fooey" (or maybe a more colorful word, lol). Sure, it's not a collision sport like football, but there is plenty of legal contact going on. I use the word "displacement" instead of "contact".

As far as the foul, the defender did extend his arms forward a bit and out of his verticality. So I have no problem with that foul call.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NB/PEI, Canada
Posts: 788
I'll say it before someone else does. Travel.

There now that it is out of the way if this is just a block/charge call I've got nothing on the defender probably not enough displacement to call a charge either so no call. If they are going on the hands and arms that is a different issue. No indication on vid.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game!

Me: Thanks, but why the big rush.

Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
If it is a choice over block vs. charge...

NFHS: Charge. The defender got to the spot with two feet down facing the opponent and stopped moving before the shooter left the floor.

NCAA: Block, while the defender got to the spot with two feet down facing the opponent and stopped moving before the shooter left the floor, he didn't do so before the upward motion started.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 24
I am with Pantherdreams. It is a clear travel before the contact. If ignoring the travel I go with nothing. Defender did nothing wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 04:34pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by srp6977 View Post
I am with Pantherdreams. It is a clear travel before the contact. If ignoring the travel I go with nothing. Defender did nothing wrong.
I do not see a clear travel at all. I see a gather in the air and then the left foot coming down first and the right following. If that is the case that is not a travel. If you are suggesting otherwise, then say why it was a travel. It is close, but not clear. And if it is that close, I do not like to have a travel call on these kinds of plays.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 14, 2014, 04:39pm
NFHS Official
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,734
Play on
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 12:06am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
If it is a choice over block vs. charge...
NCAA: Block, while the defender got to the spot with two feet down facing the opponent and stopped moving before the shooter left the floor, he didn't do so before the upward motion started.
I completely disagree. Defender looks NCAA-M legal in real time, and is clearly legal when pausing at :07 and :08, and then again at :17 and :18.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NB/PEI, Canada
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I do not see a clear travel at all. I see a gather in the air and then the left foot coming down first and the right following. If that is the case that is not a travel. If you are suggesting otherwise, then say why it was a travel. It is close, but not clear. And if it is that close, I do not like to have a travel call on these kinds of plays.

Peace
We can disagree. It looks to me as if the gather is happening with one foot on the floor which would mean that the landing for a "jump stop" needs to be two feet simultaneous and that is not close enough. Not to get into the debate again about travelling but round here we are getting that one.

In terms of the charge for NCAA men can someone clarify how the upward shooting motion is defined?. ie. How on steps (or a power move in this situation) do i know when a player is not just picking up the ball/ when they are lifting the ball to a triple threat position and when they are comign up to shoot. It seems to me that the more generous you are with this not only is it more difficult on the defense but could allow the offense to be rewarded for having poor technique/footwork.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game!

Me: Thanks, but why the big rush.

Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I am not so sure this is a block/charge play. It looks like this might have been called for more verticality purposes, then a block or charge being considered.
That's what I thought on first look.

Also, is the Center taught to mirror the call by the Lead at this level? If not, it appears that both the Lead and the Center had the same call. From the floor angle, it must have appeared as if the defender made contact with the arm of shooter. I can't imagine that both officials would have a block/charge call here.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:59pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
You know, there's a reason that these (whether they are technically traveling or not) are *never* called and it has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the officials working the game.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 04:37pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
If I'm the C on that play, I have a travel. I've called it before. Now, if I'm working for Curtis Shaw, I call that a travel, then he calls me and says "I don't want that called", then I won't call it in his games.

But for now, it's a travel in my games.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 15, 2014, 05:24pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
If I'm the C on that play, I have a travel. I've called it before. Now, if I'm working for Curtis Shaw, I call that a travel, then he calls me and says "I don't want that called", then I won't call it in his games.

But for now, it's a travel in my games.
I'm with you. I'm calling it, too. But there's play after play shown like this all season long and travels, for the most part, aren't called. These are very good officials. Just doesn't seem like all of them are simple misses.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iowa State-Oklahoma Continuation(?)...video JetMetFan Basketball 8 Tue Jan 14, 2014 01:05pm
Iowa State-BYU bench conduct (video) JetMetFan Basketball 7 Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:22am
Video Request: Kansas vs. Iowa State JRutledge Basketball 22 Tue Feb 26, 2013 08:39am
KU/Iowa St block/charge OKREF Basketball 1 Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:20pm
Iowa State / Oklahoma Adam Basketball 2 Sat Feb 18, 2012 05:30pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1