Iowa State-Oklahoma Continuation(?)...video

[Indianaref]

Foul before shooting motion. Red #3 has arm bar on rebounder, lead has great look as opposed to the camera angle.

[BryanV21]

My understanding is that, in college and below, there is no such thing as continuation. The question is "was the player fouled in a shooting motion or not?" In this case, he was not in shooting motion when he was fouled, so the shot is rightfully waived off.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

My understanding is that, in college and below, there is no such thing as continuation. The question is "was the player fouled in a shooting motion or not?" In this case, he was not in shooting motion when he was fouled, so the shot is rightfully waived off.

Continuation = "was the player fouled in a shooting motion or not?"

(The NCAA and FED rules call it "continuous motion", iirc)

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Continuation = "was the player fouled in a shooting motion or not?"

(The NCAA and FED rules call it "continuous motion", iirc)

Okay, I thought a different question was being asked here.

[Camron Rust]

No continuous motion. Rebounding foul.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

My understanding is that, in college and below, there is no such thing as continuation. The question is "was the player fouled in a shooting motion or not?" In this case, he was not in shooting motion when he was fouled, so the shot is rightfully waived off.

The rule or wording at all levels is exactly the same. Just as stated, they use a different wording to convey the very same action.

Peace