The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 05, 2014, 10:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Question Video Request - Penn State - Illinois

Wondering if there's video of the play that led to the PS player's ejection...? Also wondering if people agreed with how the play was handled (i.e. only one player being penalized)...?
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 05, 2014, 11:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The 503
Posts: 785
Penn State's D.J. Newbill Ejected For Shoving Kendrick Nunn In Neck

I don't work basketball but maybe the crew decided the UI player ran into the PSU player accidentally, so he didn't get penalized.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 12:27am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,881
Seeing the endline replay, the Illini player definitely instigated the situation. I don't if the ruled the PSU's players action a fight, or just an FF2.

If he just got an FF2, I would have gave the Illini player Class A Technical as well. If the PSU player got ejected for fighting, then the Illini player should have went also for his dead ball contact instigating a fight.

That's my opinion based on what I saw in the replay.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 01:17am
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
They both should have been tossed for fighting. Once the PSU player retaliates by throwing a punch, the situation became a fight. The UI player's actions caused the fight to occur, so he should have been tossed as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 01:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Seeing the endline replay, the Illini player definitely instigated the situation. I don't if the ruled the PSU's players action a fight, or just an FF2.

If he just got an FF2, I would have gave the Illini player Class A Technical as well. If the PSU player got ejected for fighting, then the Illini player should have went also for his dead ball contact instigating a fight.

That's my opinion based on what I saw in the replay.
Don't believe that a Class A technical foul is appropriate for the contact by the Illinois player as the ball has clearly become live during the throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 08:01am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Don't believe that a Class A technical foul is appropriate for the contact by the Illinois player as the ball has clearly become live during the throw-in.
There was a whistle for a 30-second time-out after the made basket. You can see an Illini A/C indicate to the rest of the staff that PSU was taking a 30. Listen closely and you will hear that whistle a split second before the initial contact. In fact, notice how the PSU player responsible for throw-in initially steps as if he is going to come on to the court.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Mon Jan 06, 2014 at 09:37am.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 09:34am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
After viewing the endline angle, both of them go.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 09:43am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,525
Both are ejected in my book. End line view said it all.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 01:40pm
Often wrong never n doubt
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 737
Initial bump was definitely not an accidents when viewed from the end line. Both are gone.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 02:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 744
What was the justification for not dumping all of the Illinois players who left the bench to try and join the altercation?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 02:35pm
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriggerMN View Post
What was the justification for not dumping all of the Illinois players who left the bench to try and join the altercation?
Maybe the coaches got them back quick enough? There was a timeout, so perhaps they were starting to come off the bench anyway when the altercation happened.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 06, 2014, 02:35pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriggerMN View Post
What was the justification for not dumping all of the Illinois players who left the bench to try and join the altercation?
Someone already mentioned that there was a timeout requested and granted, that's why those players were up and coming onto the court. As soon as people realized there was an altercation going on, Ill. coaches were in front of those players and shoving them back. Not sure that any of them tried to get involved in the altercation.

Now Penn St. on the other hand...there were 6 of them in the scrum of bodies. So it seems like they should have had two ejections, not just one.

And the initial Illinois player should be tossed as well.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 07, 2014, 10:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
I'm glad a few others felt both initial players should have been tossed.

That initial shove (definitely not incidental or accidental), and what ensued definitely should have resulted in two ejections.

I'm also wondering why the third man in on the scrum (PS #23) wasn't ejected; he makes no attempt to restrain his teammate, but instead keeps giving the Illinois player the business.

I'm also a bit shocked the new trail on the play appeared to be looking at the entire play, but had nothing.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Miami/Illinois held ball video request VTOfficial Basketball 8 Mon Mar 25, 2013 07:37am
Oregon/OK State video request SWMOzebra Basketball 4 Fri Mar 22, 2013 04:32pm
Video Request: Kansas vs. Iowa State JRutledge Basketball 22 Tue Feb 26, 2013 08:39am
Illinois State/Wichita video request Jesse James Basketball 35 Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:00pm
Penn St/Mich Video Request Indianaref Basketball 0 Sun Feb 17, 2013 01:50pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1