![]() |
Quote:
So you are saying that a defensive player can only obtain (NFHS)/establish (NCAA and FIBA) a LGP against an offensive player who is in control of the ball? And where in the Rules Book does it say that in order to obtain/establish a LGP that the initial position be on a line between the dribbler and the dribbler's team's basket? MTD, Sr. |
I watched it twice.
IMO, just about the easiest block I'd call all night. |
Facing the Dribbler?
Quote:
Just some food for thought!!:confused: |
I can understand the official in the game getting it wrong, we all have.
But how in the hell can anybody watch this clip in 3 different speeds and still say this is a PC foul? :confused::eek: |
Quote:
ART. 2 Charging is illegal personal contact caused by pushing or moving into an opponent's torso. a. A player who is moving with the ball is required to stop or change direction to avoid contact if a defensive player has obtained a legal guarding position in his/her path. b. If a guard has obtained a legal guarding position, the player with the ball must get his/her head and shoulders past the torso of the defensive player. If contact occurs on the torso of the defensive player, the dribbler is responsible for the contact. c. There must be reasonable space between two defensive players or a defensive player and a boundary line to allow the dribbler to continue in his/her path. If there is less than 3 feet of space, the dribbler has the greater responsibility for the contact. d. The player with the ball may not push the torso of the guard to gain an advantage to pass, shoot or dribble. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now I know a player control foul doesn't require contact directly in the torso, but you highlight this portion when the contact is shoulder to shoulder. You should have highlighted A if you were trying to make your point. |
Quote:
I believe from my angle she is in LGP. She is in the path of the offensive player. It would be better if we were in the same position as the Lead in the video because I believe that is why he called PC. It looks like a block in real time but I believe by definition and viewing "3" times or more that it is PC. If you pause the video when contact is made, the defensive player is moving backward or in the same direction as the offensive player. The offensive player is not displaced and does not have her head and shoulders past the torso of the defender. Again by rule then it is a PC foul and not a block. |
By rule a defender cannot turn their shoulder into a ball-handler and still be legal.
|
I'm very confused by the shoulder comments. I don't see B1 turning the shoulder into the offense; I see B1 turning the shoulder in front of A1 and that's where the contact is.
I think the call (no matter which you have) would be the same whether B1 turns or not (in this play). |
In the moment I don't have a problem with either call. Both can be easily justified by rule and it would depend on the officials interpretation of the guarding players LGP and positioning on the court. From the angle we have in the video it is made much harder to say for certain.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:eek:!!!! Please tell me you did not write what I just read! MTD, Sr. |
This is such an easy charge, at worst a no call as the contact is rather weak. Sure the defender could of opened a bit more to the dribbler. One of the core fundamentals in FED is that a a player is entitled to their spot on the floor as long as they got there first and legally.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12pm. |