Just making sure...

Originally Posted by BillyMac

4.42.5 SITUATION: Team A is awarded an alternating-possession throw-in.
A1’s throw-in pass is illegally kicked by B2. RULING: As a result of B2’s kicking
violation, Team A is awarded a new throw-in at the designated spot nearest to
where the kicking violation (illegal touching) occurred. Since the alternating-possession
throw-in had not been contacted legally, the throw-in has not ended and
therefore, the arrow remains with Team A for the next alternating-possession
throw-in. COMMENT: The kicking violation ends the alternating-possession
throw-in and as a result, a non-alternating-possession throw-in is administered.
When the ball is legally touched on the subsequent throw-in following the kicking
violation, the arrow shall not be changed and shall remain with Team A.

Yay. Can't wait until I have to explain this one to a coach.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Yay. Can't wait until I have to explain this one to a coach.

No harder than explaining to the coach why Team A keeps the arrow when A2 commits a TC foul during an AP throw-in.

[Adam]

It would just be so much easier if we switched the arrow as soon as the throw in started.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Adam

It would just be so much easier if we switched the arrow as soon as the throw in started.

It would be so much easier if coaches knew 50% of the rules.