Ok. State/Purdue video request (Clip Added)

[JetMetFan]

I think the crew forgot the initial foul on Purdue #23 was a TC foul. That’s the only way I can explain shooting four FTs and having OSU #21 shooting the first two FTs. Given a player was ejected I’m guessing they had to explain the entire scenario to whomever assigned the game.

[referee99]

White taunt leads to retaliatory backhand slap by black. Crew spent plenty of time at the monitor reviewing then came back having the clapping white player shooting, then another player shooting the technical.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by referee99

White taunt leads to retaliatory backhand slap by black. Crew spent plenty of time at the monitor reviewing then came back having the clapping white player shooting, then another player shooting the technical.

The retaliatory slap *was* the F2 technical. OSU #21 clapped his hands in the face of Purdue #23 after a foul call against Purdue #23, so the ball was already dead when Purdue #23 hit OSU #21 in the throat. As far as we can see on the video that was the only dead-ball situation to adjudicate.

The first two FTs – IMO – dealt with something directly against OSU #21 which is why he was the shooter. Otherwise there was no rule-based reason for him to shoot since the dead-ball contact was a technical foul. There was also no strategic reason for him to shoot because he’s only a 40% FT shooter.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

The retaliatory slap *was* the F2 technical. OSU #21 clapped his hands in the face of Purdue #23 after a foul call against Purdue #23, so the ball was already dead when Purdue #23 hit OSU #21 in the throat. As far as we can see on the video that was the only dead-ball situation to adjudicate.

The first two FTs – IMO – dealt with something directly against OSU #21 which is why he was the shooter. Otherwise there was no rule-based reason for him to shoot since the dead-ball contact was a technical foul. There was also strategic reason for him to shoot because he’s only a 40% FT shooter.

But the initial foul by Purdue 23 was TC foul. OSU 21 shouldn't have shot any free throws. Still no answer as to why they shot 4 free throws.

You can see the C running in and giving the T signal. Then they went to the monitor and upgraded it to an FF 2. Are they shooting two for the technical foul, and two for it being upgraded?

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by OKREF

But the initial foul by Purdue 23 was TC foul. OSU 21 shouldn't have shot any free throws. Still no answer as to why they shot 4 free throws.

You can see the C running in and giving the T signal. Then they went to the monitor and upgraded it to an FF 2. Are they shooting two for the technical foul, and two for it being upgraded?

Right I mention that in post number 5. I was addressing the comments regarding the possible reason for the sequence of free throws. I don't understand why there were four free throws shot either.

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by OKREF

But the initial foul by Purdue 23 was TC foul. OSU 21 shouldn't have shot any free throws. Still no answer as to why they shot 4 free throws.

You can see the C running in and giving the T signal. Then they went to the monitor and upgraded it to an FF 2. Are they shooting two for the technical foul, and two for it being upgraded?

No that isn't why they shot 4 free throws. Most likely explanation is what jetmet said. Looking at the box score/play by play, they definitely screwed up by awarding the first two free throws to #21.