|
|||
9.1.3 Delayed FT violation AFTER a TO
Just want to make sure I understand this play correctly. A1 shooting violation by B1 causes A2 to also violate (penalty is substitute FT if missed, ignore vioation by A2) A1 calls TO instead of shooting the ball. TO is granted. Players come back out and line up. Delayed violation carries over after the TO so even if no one violates during "this" FT, they will get a substitute throw if missed. Is that right or am I missing something?
|
|
|||
This is a waste of time. If he makes the free throw you got nothing to worry about and if he doesn't you can deal with it then.
|
|
|||
Maybe to you. I'll take the preventative approach and save the potential for an unnecessary argument.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Player misses the shot, call the delayed violation. If the coach has something to say at that point you can respond with 2 sentences and the conversation is over. "Coach, that is a delayed violation that carries over through the timeout. We are moving on." |
|
|||
Quote:
But if you take the approach "Coach, by rule, the violation is carried over. If the player misses their attempt, there will be another attempt awarded." Short, sweet, and simple. JMO, but I prefer the heads-up approach rather than blind siding the coach from an obscure rule. |
|
|||
I'd rather try and avoid the situation. The chances are a hell of a lot better that the coach gets mad if it's called, than the coach being mad that you took the time to explain the rule to him in the first place.
|
|
|||
I'm on the side of saying something about it as we go into the timeout.
As I report the timeout, I'm going to indicate to the scorer and coaches that the FT violation that was pending will remain in effect for the FT once we resume. Now, from a philosophical point of view, I'm not so sure I like the way the rule plays out. I'd be inclined to think that a better rule would result in the negation of the delayed violation if A want to call that timeout. The violation hasn't given the defender any advantage if there is no shot....which is the purpose of the rule to start with.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Here's another benefit of telling the HC - both of them - as the TO is being administered: It limits the debate by the HC who may be affected. (S)he probably isn't going to spend their entire TO complaining about the rule. If you tell them when the play happens and they complain you end up delaying the game.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example." "If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..." "Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4." "The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Delayed Violation | Triad zebra | Basketball | 2 | Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:55pm |
Very Delayed FT Violation | shishstripes | Basketball | 4 | Thu Jan 15, 2009 09:53am |
Delayed Delayed violation? | OHBBREF | Basketball | 16 | Fri Nov 14, 2008 08:06pm |
Horn on FT - delayed violation? | bgtg19 | Basketball | 7 | Thu Jan 20, 2005 04:17pm |
Super delayed Violation | JamieSlick | Basketball | 13 | Sat Dec 08, 2001 06:44pm |