Live ball, clock not running

Originally Posted by jritchie

So call a double team technical foul for actionless contest on both teams and go with the point of interruption, which no team had control, so go with arrow!

Why both teams? White has no obligation to try to secure an offensive rebound on a missed free throw in this situation. That's why there is no rule requiring offensive players to occupy marked lane spaces. Call the team tech on black as per NFHS 10-1-5 after a warning.

[Adam]

Neither team has an obligation to secure the rebound, IMO.

[jritchie]

Originally Posted by Adam

Neither team has an obligation to secure the rebound, IMO.

10.1.5 says someone does

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by Adam

Neither team has an obligation to secure the rebound, IMO.

I agree with this

Originally Posted by jritchie

10.1.5 says someone does

Where and why?

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by jritchie

10.1.5 says someone does

A team shall not:
Allow the game to develop into an actionless contest, this includes
the following and similar acts:
a. When the clock is not running consuming a full minute through not being
ready when it is time to start either half.
b. Delay the game by preventing the ball from being made promptly live or
from being put in play. See 7-5-1 and 8-1-2 for the resumption-of-play
procedure to use after a time-out or the intermission between quarters. The
procedure is used prior to charging a technical foul in these specific
situations.
c. Commit a violation of the throw-in boundary-line plane, as in 9-2-10, after
any team warning for delay.
d. Contact with the free thrower or a huddle of two or more players in the lane
by either team prior to a free throw following any team warning for delay.
e. Interfering with the ball following a goal after any team warning for delay.
f. Not having the court ready for play following any time-out after any team
warning for delay.

[Adam]

I see nothing in 10.1.5 that addresses this situation.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Adam

I see nothing in 10.1.5 that addresses this situation.

" ... similar acts." ???

[Adam]

similar to what?

[jritchie]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Why both teams? White has no obligation to try to secure an offensive rebound on a missed free throw in this situation. That's why there is no rule requiring offensive players to occupy marked lane spaces. Call the team tech on black as per NFHS 10-1-5 after a warning.

because both teams are allowing this to become an actionless contest. You can't just blame one team for it.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Why both teams? White has no obligation to try to secure an offensive rebound on a missed free throw in this situation. That's why there is no rule requiring offensive players to occupy marked lane spaces. Call the team tech on black as per NFHS 10-1-5 after a warning.

Neither team has an obligation to secure a rebound, but both teams have allowed it to become an actionless contest. Double T + AP Arrow solves the problem.

[Camron Rust]

Go pick up the ball, without blowing the whistle, and throw it at a player (or hand it to one) so you can start the clock!!!

[Adam]

I actually like Bob's answer.

The rules allow us to shorten the length of a period at the agreement of both teams. I'm sure the team that's ahead wouldn't have a problem. I'd be willing to take the trailing team's lack of action as an indication that they don't want to continue. I'd warn them first, of course.

I'm not inclined to go with IW (or double TF), because black gets an advantage if they get the throw in (they get to throw the ball down court with the clock stopped).

[APG]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Go pick up the ball, without blowing the whistle, and throw it at a player (or hand it to one) so you can start the clock!!!

That's taking 2-3 to new heights!