The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 04, 2013, 09:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo96 View Post
Recently saw the NCAA-W new rule survey for coaches, officials and admin's.
...



Would you be in favor of permitting coaches to be able to call a timeout ONLY during a dead ball (after a whistle blows or as soon as a ball goes through the net after a score)? No, I thought a lot about this one, but I am not yet ready to support this change.
A resounding YES. This basically returns partially to the way it was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo96 View Post
If there were a 10-second back court violation, would you be in favor of using the shot clock to count the 10 seconds in addition to the official’s count? No, but I could be convinced otherwise. I am also unsure what “in addition to” means. Despite the “accuracy” of using an actual clock I am having trouble visualizing how I could have good vision of the players, the division line, and the shot clock. 99% of the time a 10 second violation is possible, there is considerable pressure in the BC. I don’t want to have to move my eyes off the action to the clock at the other end of the court.
No one said that it has to be the trail that is checking the shot clock in this situation. It could even be the lead. For the most part, they should be able to tell of the ball is clearly in the backcourt for most situations. The C could easily do it too and has a fair look at the location of the ball.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo96 View Post
Would you be in favor of the defensive team receiving the ball after a held ball instead of using the alternating-possession arrow? No, I think a held ball is a 50-50 issue, not a turnover. Until you reinstate the actual jump ball, AP is the best solution.
Not a chance. NCAA-M tried this several years ago and it was a mess. The big issue was determining exactly who was on defense, if anyone. In some cases it is obvious but on a rebound, it just introduces too much ambiguity. Another case that was problematic was a steal or near steal then a tie-up. Which team was really on defense? Too many goofy situations were encountered so they quickly went back to the arrow.

Philosophically, a held ball, despite what some people claim, is NOT good defense. Good defense would take the ball completely. Leave it the way it is or go back to a jump ball.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 11:26am.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rules survey Scrapper1 Volleyball 1 Wed Nov 26, 2008 06:05pm
NFHS SB Rules Survey Andy Softball 11 Fri May 23, 2008 10:05pm
ncaa rules refaz Basketball 16 Thu May 15, 2008 11:20pm
NCAA rules survey Andy Softball 3 Fri May 13, 2005 10:19am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1