Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
[/B]
|
That isn't how I read the rule. The part of 2-10-4 that starts with "unless" (quoted above) says to me that when the c.e. involves awarding free throws and there has been no change of team possession since the error, you
don't resume from the point of interruption. [/B][/QUOTE]Exactly! I agree with that completely,and that's what I've been trying to say. In this case,they DID NOT resume from the point of interruption. They DID resume from the "normal free throws" that would be taken for the second B foul.That's when they discovered the error,and that's when they corrected it. What's confusing is that "resumption of the normal free throws",in this particular case,also happened to occur at the exact same time as the "point of interruption" did.
Thu Jul 24, 2003, 04:07pm
Threaded Mode
