Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
[/B]
|
[/B][/QUOTE]
How do you square this with rule 2-10-4, which tells us that "When an error is corrected, play shall be resumed from the point of interruption to correct the error, unless the correction involves awarding merited free throw(s) and there has been no change of team possession since the error was made. In that case, play shall resume as after any normal free throw."
[/B][/QUOTE]Lotto,in this particular case,using the language of the rule above,the "point of interruption" and play resuming as "after any normal free throw' happen to be exactly the same thing. They discovered the error before the "normal free throws" were taken,,and then corrected the error before again resuming play with the "normal free throws" for the 2nd. B foul. Make sense?