The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantherdreams View Post
First one is a coin toss for me. The defenders leg is extended beyond but I can't tell if the intial contact was chest and shoulder and then the D gets tangled in the leg on the way down or if the entanglement with the leg to the legal upper body contact.

2nd - illegal screen the only thing making contact is extended forearms

3rd - I don't have anything on the thrid one. Screener is set and braces himself never extends outside his vertical area. (imo). Very physical play but screener isn't doing anything illegal.
Agree with all of this. #1 has a wide stance but the wide stance isn't the problem, the contact occurs with the torso primarily, so I would agree with the no call.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2013, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth- For Now
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
The second, i would probably pass on except for the arm extracurricular activity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantherdreams View Post

2nd - illegal screen the only thing making contact is extended forearms
I think the second one is the most clearly illegal and I don't see how you could pass on it. Forget the arm activity, the screeners right leg extends and trips the defender. How are the forearms the only thing making contact when the right leg clearly trips the defender?

The 1st and 3rd I can see room for debate.

The 1st play I would lean toward being illegal followed by a clear blocking foul on the 2nd defender. Hard to believe they had no whistle on that play.

The 3rd play I would lean toward legal.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2013, 01:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
The first one is illegal.

The second one looks illegal, but like others have said, it's a bad camera angle.

The third one is legal.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: A little east of there.
Posts: 650
1. A2's feet are too wide, BUT the B1 does not contact A2's legs. Rather, he blows through A2's torso. For this reason, I say "legal" screen.

2. "Illegal". A2's arms are up at chest level with slight extension at contact. That's a no no.

3. "Legal". Tough to see the slight hip movement. Time and space seem to be fine. Defender was given one full step.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 26, 2013, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 41
1. illegal (after repeated viewings)

2. illegal

3. legal
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why can't we be friends? Rob_K Basketball 12 Sat Dec 08, 2012 09:51am
For our friends in MA Nevadaref Basketball 1 Tue Aug 18, 2009 08:22am
Hello to all my Ump Friends! Elaine "Lady Blue" Softball 11 Wed Jul 14, 2004 11:18pm
Hello to all my friends mtoombs Baseball 1 Thu Aug 24, 2000 05:26pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1