![]() |
|
|||
|
All of this interaction is really somewhat locally based. What is acceptable might be the position of the person doing the critic or the situation.
I am a state clinician so people often ask me what I think. I mostly give that opinion when I am asked or I know the person directly, otherwise I give no advice. And considering I am younger than many officials I observe, I really say little to nothing to those individuals unless they have welcomed my comments. And evaluator that is instructed to evaluate, has every right to give feedback even if unwanted. So it really depends on multiple situations an reasoning for the evaluation. I am sure in some associations there is a hierarchy that is allowed to give such evaluations when not asked for and other places only wanted when asked for. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| The 3 versus 2 fallacies, a mini-rant - "Part deux" | imaref | Basketball | 6 | Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:39am |