Quote:
I think this particular case is borderline and which way it goes probably has more to do with how chippy the game has been to that point. Playing the ball shouldn't be a get of jail free card. You can be playing the ball and still use excessive force. |
Good discussion here.
Play #1, I like the fact they review it on the monitor. Very close... the contact is excessive and in the face so I would opt for a Flagrant #1. Play #2. This is not a foul by any stretch of the imagination. If you disagree, i would encourage more tape review of similar plays. This is not a "rulebook" decision but understanding how the game is played. There is zero illegal contact that would merit a defensive foul regardless of the juncture of the game. I am totally against "swallowing the whistle" because it is the end of the game, but it needs to be a legit, no-doubt foul. You put a marginal one in at this juncture of the game and one's career will be VERY short. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
#2 No call all day long....and night too. |
Quote:
And I agree that and IF (F1) is at least in the discussion. Being hit in the face alone is not enough for it, but the follow through and take down takes it to that level. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
You need to get the first foul. If you pass, the contact gets harder. We want to avoid any escalation of rough play.
There is NO foul on the drive. It is marginal contact at best especially given the end of game scenario. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11am. |