NCAAM Flagrant 2

[stiffler3492]

I think the player was given a Flagrant 2 on this play.

Here's a link to a page where there are several angles of the play: Is this the dirtiest play of the college basketball season so far? (GIF) | Off the Bench

Neither the ESPN nor the Valpo box score was any help in identifying the type of foul that was called, I just know the player was ejected.

Anyone think this should only be a flagrant 1?

Added by APG:

[JugglingReferee]

Fed.... thinking about the DQ.

[just another ref]

NFHS flagrant technical

[Rich]

Originally Posted by just another ref

NFHS flagrant technical

Try again.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Rich

Try again.

don't think so

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by just another ref

NFHS flagrant technical

Originally Posted by Rich

Try again.

Originally Posted by just another ref

don't think so

Try again....a fragrant technical is not among your available options.

[Camron Rust]

I was leaning towards an F1 upon seeing it...though I wouldn't argue with an F2 as it wasn't far from it. It was excessive contact but he did come across the front where the ball was.

I could easily see and argue for F2 if the same level of contact wasn't near the ball.

How I would rule could also be swayed by any previous issues in the game.

[stiffler3492]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I was leaning towards an F1 upon seeing it...though I wouldn't argue with an F2 as it wasn't far from it. It was excessive contact but he did come across the front where the ball was.

I could easily see and argue for F2 if the same level of contact wasn't near the ball.

How I would rule could also be swayed by any previous issues in the game.

I agree with this