Running out of bounds and back in

[RookieDude]

9-3-3

The act of running OOB for an unauthorized reason use to be a T.

The rule was changed to just a violation....NFHS wanted this called, and thought with just a violation it would be.

Still do not see it called much...but, had a partner warn players the other night (in a BV game) for running OOB, their frontcourt endline, and ended up calling a violation for it.

The coach didn't really like the call...but, P told coach he had warned them previously.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by RookieDude

9-3-3

The act of running OOB for an unauthorized reason use to be a T.

The rule was changed to just a violation....NFHS wanted this called, and thought with just a violation it would be.

Still do not see it called much...but, had a partner warn players the other night (in a BV game) for running OOB, their frontcourt endline, and ended up calling a violation for it.

The coach didn't really like the call...but, P told coach he had warned them previously.

I called it for the first time last year in an off-season game of some sort.

[#olderthanilook]

This is a clear case of the defense gaining an unfair advantage.

I handle it the same way as Tio and others have mentioned. Which is how I would handle a "carry", for example.

[Sharpshooternes]

Can someone clarify the administration of the last case play?

9.3.3 SITUATION C:

A1 and A2 set a double screen near the end line. B3 intentionally goes out of bounds outside the end line to avoid being detained by A1 and A2. Just as B3 goes out of bounds, A3's try is in flight.

RULING: B3 is called for a leaving-the-floor violation. Team A will receive the ball out of bounds at a spot nearest to where the violation occurred. Since the violation is on the defense, the ball does not become dead until the try has ended. If the try is successful, it will count. (6-7-9 Exception d)

If the try is good but you have already called the violation, does A get the basket AND the ball back or does B get the ball as after a made basket and ignore the whistled violation?

[PG_Ref]

"A" gets the basket and the ball. Never seen it called, probably never will.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Can someone clarify the administration of the last case play?

9.3.3 SITUATION C:

A1 and A2 set a double screen near the end line. B3 intentionally goes out of bounds outside the end line to avoid being detained by A1 and A2. Just as B3 goes out of bounds, A3's try is in flight.

RULING: B3 is called for a leaving-the-floor violation. Team A will receive the ball out of bounds at a spot nearest to where the violation occurred. Since the violation is on the defense, the ball does not become dead until the try has ended. If the try is successful, it will count. (6-7-9 Exception d)

If the try is good but you have already called the violation, does A get the basket AND the ball back or does B get the ball as after a made basket and ignore the whistled violation?

It's one of those case plays that you should know well just so you never call it.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Can someone clarify the administration of the last case play?

9.3.3 SITUATION C:

A1 and A2 set a double screen near the end line. B3 intentionally goes out of bounds outside the end line to avoid being detained by A1 and A2. Just as B3 goes out of bounds, A3's try is in flight.

RULING: B3 is called for a leaving-the-floor violation. Team A will receive the ball out of bounds at a spot nearest to where the violation occurred. Since the violation is on the defense, the ball does not become dead until the try has ended. If the try is successful, it will count. (6-7-9 Exception d)

If the try is good but you have already called the violation, does A get the basket AND the ball back or does B get the ball as after a made basket and ignore the whistled violation?

A would get the ball.

Also, put this in the same category as a multiple foul...don't call it.