Crazy 1 and 1 play...

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

So the best ruling would be B1 would receive the ball because they were in team control or AP because there was no Player control at the time?

Player control has nothing to do with it.

[tomegun]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

I think he may have been as confused as the players.

And yes, I've done it too.

I have done it too. Sometimes it is best to come right out and admit that first thing.

[maven]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

So the best ruling would be B1 would receive the ball because they were in team control or AP because there was no Player control at the time?

When you blow an IW, you go POI:

1. Throw in for team in control, if any, and if not then
2. Free throws or throw-in, if that's what was interrupted, and otherwise
3. AP throw-in

Option 3 is your last resort.

POI ≠ AP.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by maven

When you blow an IW, you go POI:

1. Throw in for team in control, if any, and if not then
2. Free throws or throw-in, if that's what was interrupted, and otherwise
3. AP throw-in

Option 3 is your last resort.

POI ≠ AP.

#2 should add "or if one was due."

[maven]

Originally Posted by Adam

#2 should add "or if one was due."

That's captured in the sense of 'interrupted'.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by maven

That's captured in the sense of 'interrupted'.

Arguably, maybe, but there are several situations that don't involve team control or occur during a TI or FT that don't go to the arrow. A shot in flight that goes in, a DB double technical....