Ucon MU OT

[Triad zebra]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP

The "situation that leads to the discovery" is irrelevant. The goaltending violation, along with everything else that happens prior to the discovery of the officials' error, is to stand, and be treated as though the teams were going in the proper directions.

NCHSAA read 4-5-4. After the GT is called the mistake was recognized. Count the basket and get everyone going the proper direction.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by NCHSAA

Since there was no goaltend the only means of determining control was the arrow. Which favored Marquette since UConn won the tip, even going the wrong way.

If there's no GT, then there's no try, then there's still TC.

IW gives the ball back to the team with TC.

[NCHSAA]

Originally Posted by tjones1

If there's no GT, then there's no try, then there's still TC.

IW gives the ball back to the team with TC.

Who had control?

[NCHSAA]

What is the difference then in the case book play where you have a foul and the ball goes in if going the wrong direection??? You still do not count the basket and you correct off of that.

You cannot disregard NCAA 4-73 (Page 64)

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by NCHSAA

Who had control?

The team last in control is still in team control, because, by your logic in this play, there wasn't a try.