![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Hadn't Seen this Before
I know the definition of the time-out area, so I don't need that posted, but I saw something odd during a BV tourney championship tonight and am curious about opinions.
1. 60-sec timeout, A is still in huddle standing on floor at first horn, B breaks huddle at first and B players come lean in A's huddle listening to coach. A coach notices as he breaks huddle and goes ballistic but doesn't get whacked. 2. A1 fouls out, A coach is on the clock to replace and calls team over for huddle on court, once again several B players come up behind A players and stick their ears in to listen. Coach goes crazy and gets whacked this time. In both cases, do you have anything? Last edited by rekent; Sat Dec 29, 2012 at 11:50pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
For 1 though, I was wondering if it could be considered unsportsmanlike? Some backstory, these 2 teams are bitter rivals who really hate each other. Following 1, the head coaches had a nice heated exchange nose to nose at mid court. |
|
|||
|
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
|
Definitely. If you ring them each up after #1, #2 - even though they can do it - probably doesn't happen.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example." "If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..." "Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4." "The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I can see allowing B players to locate themselves wherever they wish. It's the leaning in that I have an issue with. It's contradictory to the betterment of the game, so if I disallow it, it's on that premise.
__________________
Pope Francis Last edited by JugglingReferee; Sun Dec 30, 2012 at 01:28pm. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|