Test results

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Adam

Was this written by your state?

They got it wrong.

It's a true or false question.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by just another ref

It's a true or false question.

So the answer is false because the throw-in following the FTs has nothing to do with the technical foul and is solely determined by the location of the flagrant personal foul.
Now who was it that wrote that other scenario...

Big of you to post this. I will use it to help train some local officials.
We are never too good to learn something.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by just another ref

It's a true or false question.

Well never mind.

[just another ref]

While both of these scenarios fall under the "Things I'm confident I'll never see" label, the following occurs to me: At least if we're dealing with a flagrant, the offended team still keeps the ball. At most, the throw-in spot will vary by a few feet. But in the REALLY unlikely situation posted earlier where the T was followed by a personal foul on the airborne shooter, the retained possession by the offended team is pushed aside for no reason other than the sequence of events. I find that disturbing.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by just another ref

While both of these scenarios fall under the "Things I'm confident I'll never see" label, the following occurs to me: At least if we're dealing with a flagrant, the offended team still keeps the ball. At most, the throw-in spot will vary by a few feet. But in the REALLY unlikely situation posted earlier where the T was followed by a personal foul on the airborne shooter, the retained possession by the offended team is pushed aside for no reason other than the sequence of events. I find that disturbing.

The fact that they're getting two free throws is sufficient for me.