![]() |
|
|
|||
hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm not sure about that, but then again I'm not sure either way. In the case of say a jump shot, the shot would still count, so why would it be different here. I would conjecture that based on logic and how this is handled during a jump shot count the FT but they don't get a second one.
I actually can't wait to learn how this should be adjudicated because this is a pretty good case play. In HS the only issue would be that the only players who could commit this foul without violating first would be the players behind the three point arc. Either way nice scenario.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Adam, I am trying to think in HS how this could happen along the lane without a player violating since the ball hasn't hit the rim or backboard AND not committing an act that is intentional (IE. two-handed shove), and for the life of me I can't envision it. In college I completely agree with your statement.
My hang up was the second shot and I would like a rule or casebook citation as this is one area that I agree with your ruling, and mine also makes logical sense as well. So you are saying that the first FT counts and then the lane is cleared for the second?
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
||||
Quote:
I see no rule basis for disallowing the second shot. This is a classic false double foul, each carrying its own penalty. The penalty for the first is a one and one, which means a second shot if the first is successful. There's no rule that allows the official to negate a part of this penalty. What's your logic? As for high school, I could see it happening with a hold or push that wasn't intentional. Not likely, as I've never seen it, but it's not unthinkable.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
And yes, it is not hard for a foul to occur without a violation before the FT restrictions end (whether that point is on the release or when the ball hits). The FT restrictions only limit extending the feet outside the lane space. The arms are not restricted....so a foul could easily occur. Maybe not likely, but very possible. Alternately, the foul could just involve players not along the lane.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
Most college officials would get this one right, I would hope. And, in HS, you cn commit a foul without violating -- most foulds are committed with the hands / arms / torso and most violations involve a step with the foot. Now, a I agree maybe a more patient whistle could have avoided the situation, but I wasn't there to see it. |
|
|||
Yup the logic seems sound. Why should a player not be entitled to finish his 1&1 and still get the second shot? That does make sense. The only loop for me was the NEXT FT, I would have counted the first one anyway, I would have kicked the part after that.
Glad we straightened it out.
__________________
in OS I trust |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with a Sitch.. | jmaellis | Softball | 15 | Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:53pm |
Sitch | Skahtboi | Softball | 27 | Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:11am |
Sitch | whiskers_ump | Softball | 15 | Sun Mar 19, 2006 09:37pm |
Sub sitch........ | zebra44 | Basketball | 2 | Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:09am |
Out of box - sitch | mick | Basketball | 5 | Wed Sep 04, 2002 02:04pm |