2012-13 NFHS Basketball Rules Interpretations ...

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

For that matter, half of these are pretty basic concepts. It seems this is more of a basic refresher than it is a clarification of confusing or ambiguous situations.

The reason for this is obvious: the Fed, monitoring this forum, realizes that all true controversial questions and ambiguous situations are effectively, clearly, and expeditiously settled here on our discussion board, such that they really have nothing new to publish. So they've gotta settle for the hum-drum refresher situations.
Or am I just getting cocky?

[APG]

Originally Posted by Freddy

The reason for this is obvious: the Fed, monitoring this forum, realizes that all true controversial questions and ambiguous situations are effectively, clearly, and expeditiously settled here on our discussion board, such that they really have nothing new to publish. So they've gotta settle for the hum-drum refresher situations.
Or am I just getting cocky?

If that were truly the case, there would be the handful to idiotic interpretations and editorial changes that NFHS is notorious for.

And I got to agree with Camron...a lot of these interpretations, there are applicable case book plays that clearly spell out some of these situations.