|
|||
Almost Agree ...
Agree 100% on this interpretation. I'm still not convinced on the injured player, but I'm still open to other's opinions, hopefully backed by citations.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
A1 is injured. Coaches requests TO. A1 is not really ready, but coach says she is. Ok, let's continue with A1... then coach requests another TO. Boom - A1 gets another TO to "be more ready". If at the end of any subsequent TO A1 is still not really ready, the coach can just say that the pain came back and present A6. Let A6 in and continue.
__________________
Pope Francis Last edited by JugglingReferee; Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 10:19am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
time-out(s) to get the player ready. Then it was added to the rule the coach could be granted "a time-out"... under the condition the injured/bleeding player "must be ready by the end of the time-out." There was no indication that "time-outs" could be used. No doubt there is an element of contradiction between the two rules; but the interpretation I remember is what I said before: two different situations but one intent not to have a lengthy delay getting a player back into the game or allowing a player to shoot crucial free throws after the end of the 4th qtr./OT |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Sans Injury
Let's say, for discussion purposes, that we are talking about a timeout situation not for an injury.
End of game, teams are in a timeout, timeout ends and as players are returning to the floor coach A (who called the original time out) doesn't like the matchups he is seeing and calls another time out - nothing wrong with that, right? Now insert an injured player into the mix - same exact situation as above except the injured player wasn't ready by the end of the first timeout and was subbed for after the first timeout. Coach A doesn't like what he sees and calls the second timeout. During that second timeout the injured player is readied and enters the game – again nothing wrong with that. So let’s just eliminate the step of having the teams report back to the floor before calling the second timeout. |
|
|||
Quote:
Maybe because you would never grant two timeouts to the same team at the same time. Even successive timeouts are singular - they only occur one at a time and would be referred to as a timeout (singular). |
|
|||
Great Rule Exercise Today
Quote:
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
See scrapper's post in this thread for exhibit A.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
There was no indication that "time outs" couldnt be used either.
For me the intent of the rule is simply to get the player patched up on the teams time NOT on dead ball free time. IMO if the team wants to burn all of their time, that is their business. When can a timeout be granted?
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Successive Time Outs | Loudwhistle2 | Basketball | 9 | Mon Jan 09, 2012 01:59pm |
Injured player, Official time out | mkarp | Basketball | 4 | Wed Jan 12, 2011 09:51am |
Time for injured player | sallender | Basketball | 8 | Fri Feb 27, 2009 04:41pm |
Time-out to keep injured player in game NFHS | sixer | Basketball | 5 | Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:00pm |
Injured Player Returning With No Time Off Clock | FeetBallRef | Basketball | 3 | Wed Feb 07, 2007 06:07am |