The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
defensive stance

If the offensive player sets himself at low post, back to the basket and the defensive player stands behind him and sticks his entire leg between the offensive players legs, is this a legal defensive position?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 11:54am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanc View Post
If the offensive player sets himself at low post, back to the basket and the defensive player stands behind him and sticks his entire leg between the offensive players legs, is this a legal defensive position?
Nothing you stated has anything to do with legality. If there is no contact then you an stand anyway you want. If there is contact then is the defender or offensive player displacing their opponent. If the defender (or offensive player) has to stick their knee in the back of their opponent then the answer is no. Legality with positioning is about contact ultimately and when the contact takes place.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
So in this case, there is no problem with the position until contact is made

So if the offensive player trips over the defensive players foot, the offensive player initiated the contact so foul is on him. On the other hand, if the defensive player makes contact with the body of offensive player to upset his balance or displace him, then it's a foul on defense.
Have I got this right?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:30pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanc View Post
So in this case, there is no problem with the position until contact is made

So if the offensive player trips over the defensive players foot, the offensive player initiated the contact so foul is on him. On the other hand, if the defensive player makes contact with the body of offensive player to upset his balance or displace him, then it's a foul on defense.
Have I got this right?
As I said, if there is no displacement and there is no contact where players put their feet is irrelevant. It is only an issue when the contact takes place that displaces or prevents the movement of their opponent. And in your description I would be more concerned with where the knee is to maintain that position as opposed to just where the feet are located.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:33pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
If a defensive player simply has their leg between the offensive player's legs like you described, then it's nothing. What usually gets a defender in trouble is when they lift the leg. If it dislodges the post player, you're going to have a foul on the defender.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:55pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
If the defender trips the offensive player with his leg sticking out like this, I've got a foul on the defender. He's entitled to his normal space; sticking the leg out doesn't qualify.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2012, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanc View Post
So if the offensive player trips over the defensive players foot, the offensive player initiated the contact so foul is on him. On the other hand, if the defensive player makes contact with the body of offensive player to upset his balance or displace him, then it's a foul on defense.
Have I got this right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
If the defender trips the offensive player with his leg sticking out like this, I've got a foul on the defender. He's entitled to his normal space; sticking the leg out doesn't qualify.
Agree.

Who initiates the contact is a concept that is sometimes but not always accurate. It can help with the thought process in some cases but you will come to the wrong answer if you make many decisions based only on it.

Instead, it is about who is not in a legal position when contact occurs. A defender's legs or arms are not in a legal position if they are extended outside of their frame. If contact sufficient for a foul occurs with such an extended limb, the defender has committed the foul...even if the offensive player initiates the contact. The defender only gets to restrict the offensive players movements if they are doing so legally.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 01:06pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2012, 07:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3
I think I understand now. No contact, no foul. If offensive player trips over the leg, tripping is called on defense. If the offensive player attempts to move left or right to catch a pass but can't because he runs into that leg, that's impedeing his movement. If the defensive player uses the leg as a means of moving the other player off his spot, that's displacement. Who knew there was so much to watch for in a couple of basically stationary players.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2012, 05:14pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,954
Eyes Behind Our Heads, Like My Second Grade Teacher, Mrs. Edsel ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by shanc View Post
Who knew there was so much to watch for in a couple of basically stationary players.
All of us knew. Welcome to our world.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Offside Defensive Deflection vs. Defensive Play CMHCoachNRef Soccer 4 Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:45pm
Stance mike1989 Baseball 20 Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:08pm
GD Stance LLPA13UmpDan Baseball 42 Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:15pm
Plate Stance Blue37 Baseball 1 Fri Mar 31, 2006 01:31pm
plate stance archer Softball 8 Thu May 27, 2004 09:01am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1