The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 07:01pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Not sure why we don't protect shooters who get their shot blocked, but we don't.
Never understood this. Where does it say that sufficient body contact is allowed if a clean hand is on the ball?
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 07:16pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
Never understood this. Where does it say that sufficient body contact is allowed if a clean hand is on the ball?
Show me in the rulebook where the term, "Protect the shooter" is even listed? Just like that is a standard that many use, so is the philosophy to not call a foul on this kind of contact.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 07:36pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrutledge View Post
show me in the rulebook where the term, "protect the shooter" is even listed?
nfhs 10-6-1
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 09:20pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
nfhs 10-6-1
Really? A player shall not hold, push, charge, trip or impede the progress of an opponent by extending arm(s), shoulder(s), hip(s) or knee(s), or by bending his/her body into other than a normal position; nor use any rough tactics.

Sorry, don't see "protecting the shooter" in there.

You said you are going to your first camp this off-season, right?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 09:20pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
nfhs 10-6-1
Well you may have to look for another reference because nothing in that rule uses the language "protect the shooter." And there is nothing in that specific reference that talks about even a shooter.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 09:39pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Well you may have to look for another reference because nothing in that rule uses the language "protect the shooter." And there is nothing in that specific reference that talks about even a shooter.
"Shooter" is covered by another noun in that rule.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 09:44pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
"Shooter" is covered by another noun in that rule.
Sometimes just admit when you are wrong instead of trying to massage the English language to fit your interpretations.

"Protect the shooter" is an officiating term. Its commonly accepted definition is that we need to protect jump shooters from the time they go airborne, through the release, and all the way back to the floor.

It you want to give it your own definition, fine, but don't insult our reading abilities and acquired knowledge by telling us it's in NFHS Rule 10-6-1.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Fri May 04, 2012 at 10:06pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 10:22pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Sometimes just admit when you are wrong instead of trying to massage the English language to fit your interpretations.
You're jumping the gun, BNR. Besides, it's an internet forum, where the English language is the tool of the trade. Anyway, let's see if we can do this without being snide.

It's pretty simple, really. The shooter falls under "opponent" here, and you can't push an opponent (10-6-1). That's where it's in the book, black and white.

In this play, Anthony was clearly pushed by James. To JRut's point, the only reason he lands on two feet is he's forced to regain balance in mid-air by kicking up his left leg. That wouldn't have been necessary without the body contact caused by James.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.

Last edited by bainsey; Fri May 04, 2012 at 10:26pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 05, 2012, 06:15am
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,524
The Three F's ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
"Protect the shooter" is an officiating term. Its commonly accepted definition is that we need to protect jump shooters from the time they go airborne, through the release, and all the way back to the floor.
Foot, floor, foul.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 04, 2012, 09:59pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
"Shooter" is covered by another noun in that rule.
Interesting. Next time I will read your mind and hope that everyone follows so we can all be consistent. As no one I have ever met used that rule as a justification for the term "protect the shooter" which is mostly used as an officiating jargon to explain that we should follow the shooter to the floor and make sure they are not killed. This play in question not only did the shooter not get killed, he landed on two feet and was able to participate in the play if a foul was not called. If that is a foul on a shooter, then any contact on the shooter is illegal and that is not what any rule states, even the reference you made with 10-6-1.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Block shot attempt, slap back-board? jritchie Basketball 21 Fri Jan 28, 2011 06:55pm
Foul on FT attempt Peach State Ref Basketball 3 Tue Dec 16, 2008 09:02pm
Block/Charge Call in Miami v. Virginia OFISHE8 Basketball 55 Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:51am
Slapping Backboard on block shot attempt? jritchie Basketball 45 Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:39pm
Heat-Knicks jackgil Basketball 13 Tue Jun 06, 2000 02:28pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1