The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 08:28am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,987
Foul was called b/c B1's arms were never vertical, even before A1 contacted him with the shoulder. But B1 was not moving forward at time of contact.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Foul was called b/c B1's arms were never vertical, even before A1 contacted him with the shoulder. But B1 was not moving forward at time of contact.
Look again...B1's feet (foot) were inside the RA just before the shoulder contact and were coming forward...several inches outside of the RA at the time of that contact. Can't get between those two points without moving forward.

The foul that was called was not for that, indeed, but the block/charge element of the play was a block. There was a claim that this body contact caused the arms to not be vertical.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Sun Mar 18, 2012 at 12:02pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 12:14pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Look again...B1's feet (foot) were inside the RA just before the shoulder contact and were coming forward...several inches outside of the RA at the time of that contact. Can't get between those two points without moving forward.

The foul that was called was not for that, indeed, but the block/charge element of the play was a block. There was a claim that this body contact caused the arms to not be vertical.
Agreed, it wasn't just his feet, either. His torso was moving also.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 12:27pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Could have easily been a no call.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 05:27pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Could have easily been a no call.
No. I will call that every time.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 01:38pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Look again...B1's feet (foot) were inside the RA just before the shoulder contact and were coming forward...several inches outside of the RA at the time of that contact. Can't get between those two points without moving forward.
....
That movement by B1's feet occurred while A1 while still moving laterally. B1's feet were set again before the contact from A1's shoulder.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
That movement by B1's feet occurred while A1 while still moving laterally. B1's feet were set again before the contact from A1's shoulder.
I just can't picture moving your feet forward while moving laterally while you body is connected to your feet.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 01:50pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I just can't picture moving your feet forward while moving laterally while you body is connected to your feet.
Re-read my post.

And look at the video. A1's initial movement takes him in a direction away from the basket. B1 move's his feet forward during A1's initial movement.

PS: if someone moves diagonally they will then have moved laterally and forward relative to their previous position
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Sun Mar 18, 2012 at 01:59pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 04:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Re-read my post.

And look at the video. A1's initial movement takes him in a direction away from the basket. B1 move's his feet forward during A1's initial movement.

PS: if someone moves diagonally they will then have moved laterally and forward relative to their previous position
And if ANY part of that movement, even if there is lateral movement, is forward, that is all that matters. Moving laterally doesn't excuse forward movement. And the forward movement that I'm referring to happened at exactly the time of the shoulder contact. Maybe there was other forward movement too but the only movement that matters is that which occurred at the very moment of contact.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 05:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3
This is being over-thought and is an easy play. The contact by the offense was marginal, not even close to being enough for a foul. Was the defense vertical...no=foul. If you call a PC on that play you will not be working that level for long.

Side note, notice the L doubling the whistle. This was a routine defensive foul. These are also two of the very best in the tourney, wouldn't be surprised to see the C in the FF (probably an alternate) and the L in a regional semi/final.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 01:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Foul was called b/c B1's arms were never vertical, even before A1 contacted him with the shoulder. But B1 was not moving forward at time of contact.
I agree, B1 arms are not vertical and that's where I think they called the foul, but IMO there is clear displacement from A1 her well prior to the upstairs contact.

Thanks for posting and discussing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/89949-murray-state-v-marquette.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Racer Nation • View topic - Interesting topic This thread Refback Mon Mar 19, 2012 09:54pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Colorado State v. Murray State Video Thread APG Basketball 5 Sat Mar 17, 2012 06:33pm
Tenn St/Murray St JetMetFan Basketball 67 Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:14am
Murray State vs. Butler - Player Control CDurham Basketball 11 Sun Mar 21, 2010 03:55pm
Murray State/Vanderbilt play bas2456 Basketball 6 Fri Mar 19, 2010 01:35am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1