The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 01:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
On this play, I don't see a single instant where the defender has gained LGP. He's constantly moving sideways, one way or the other, and twice leans into the shooter (the uncalled first time more blatantly than the called 2nd time, IMHO).
He had LGP almost the entire time. Moving has little to do with LGP. The only time, when a player has LGP, that movement becomes illegal is when, at the time of contact, the defender was moving toward the opponent....which is the case in the Duke clip (along with not being vertical...arms extended over opponent).

NFHS quote...but the rules are the same...
The guard may move laterally or obliquely to maintain position, provided it is not toward the opponent when contact occurs.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 02:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
The guard may move laterally or obliquely to maintain position, provided it is not toward the opponent when contact occurs.
Except for ONE of his steps, they were ALL toward the opponent (one was even followed by a reasonably hard chest bump while offense was not even moving toward the defender yet).
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 02:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Except for ONE of his steps, they were ALL toward the opponent (one was even followed by a reasonably hard chest bump while offense was not even moving toward the defender yet).
That contact was incidental and did not gain an advantage. In fact I think the contact went both ways. If the defender would have planted his feet and taken the contact he might have had a chance to draw a player control foul. However he didn't and leaned into the shooter, making contact and creating a clear disadvantage for the shooter. Easy foul call
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
Good discussion everyone. I have sincerely enjoyed the debate and deserved most jabs thrown at me. I still think the defender committed a foul, but I do at least see the other side of the argument now.

Hope everyone has a good conclusion to their seasons.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 03:10pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Except for ONE of his steps, they were ALL toward the opponent (one was even followed by a reasonably hard chest bump while offense was not even moving toward the defender yet).
LGP may be gained while moving towards the defender. The chest bumps are another story, however, as LGP doesn't give that right to the defender.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Except for ONE of his steps, they were ALL toward the opponent (one was even followed by a reasonably hard chest bump while offense was not even moving toward the defender yet).
Yes, I agree. But that is not relevant. He still has LGP. The only time forward movement becomes a problem is at the moment of contact. Until then, the direction of movement is not a factor in determining LGP.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 06:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLH17 View Post
I'm not stupid, thank you very little.
The ones complaining about this play in the OP are.

I have still yet to see this foul on Pressey that they are so upset about. He got called for a hand check or a hold against a dribbler that sent a KU player to the line late in OT that sealed the win. The people I have been talking to keep complaining about consistency and how it should have been a no-call on Pressey if this was a no-call. I'm trying to explain to them that plays are judged individually, but I'm sure it will go in one ear and out the other.

Watch this video from the stands and pause at about :58 when Robinson jumps. If that isn't verticality, I don't know what is. (I know the camera is shaky...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGRQHMrZOJU
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2012, 09:59pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 15,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
The ones complaining about this play in the OP are.

I have still yet to see this foul on Pressey that they are so upset about. He got called for a hand check or a hold against a dribbler that sent a KU player to the line late in OT that sealed the win. The people I have been talking to keep complaining about consistency and how it should have been a no-call on Pressey if this was a no-call. I'm trying to explain to them that plays are judged individually, but I'm sure it will go in one ear and out the other.

Watch this video from the stands and pause at about :58 when Robinson jumps. If that isn't verticality, I don't know what is. (I know the camera is shaky...)
The hand-checking foul on the drive was an easy call. The imaginary whistle in my head went off as the play was live on my TV.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 02, 2012, 12:07am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Yes, I agree. But that is not relevant. He still has LGP. The only time forward movement becomes a problem is at the moment of contact. Until then, the direction of movement is not a factor in determining LGP.
Exactly.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When a block is a foul KenL.nation Basketball 47 Thu Jun 17, 2010 05:31pm
Question about Stat on Foul - Block CoachAZ Basketball 10 Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:13pm
Consensus - Clean Block Signal? rfp Basketball 15 Thu Nov 16, 2006 03:41pm
Roughing passer or "clean hands" foul? bigwhistle Football 7 Mon Nov 03, 2003 01:23am
Block foul Jim Dixon Basketball 0 Wed Mar 15, 2000 10:18am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1