|
|||
Intentional Tripping
UK MissSt game. Player is mad that a foul wasnt called on a dunk attempt. While staring down the official he kicks out and intentionally trips theoonent heading up the floor.
Called flagrant 1. What would be required for a flagrant 2? |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
If someone wants to give me a time stamp, I'll have the play up later.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, it was a fun 2 minutes. |
|
|||
Foul occurred with 11:57 to play in the second half. Commentators actually used the phrase "point of interruption" to describe how play would be resumed. They got something right!
Wait, that's right, right? NCAA rules aren't my specialty. Last edited by La Rikardo; Wed Feb 22, 2012 at 02:03am. |
|
|||
I really thought they were going to eject him on that play. Especially considering it seemed they were trying to gain some sort of control of the game at that point. Plus if that attempted trip/kick had connected, there would have been a melee.
|
|
|||
No, they used it for the flagrant. Only technicals are resumed from POI in NCAA, then, right? Flagrant personal fouls are resumed as a flagrant or intentional would in NFHS. That makes more sense. Still impressive for a commentator to use book language like "point of interruption" even if it's used at the wrong time.
|
|
|||
Quote:
I hope APG can find the video!
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
During live action, the official whistled and signaled a T. It didn't appear he saw the kick/trip but was reaction to some verbal disagreement from the player.
They then went to the monitor and came out with a flagrant 1 but there was no mention of the T. The officials had a somewhat rough time in that game at times. Some big stuff was miss called. They got some tough stuff right too. The right guy had stepped to the for a pair of FTs after a rebounding foul at the opposite end. For some reason (announcers suggested an opponent pointed out that someone else should be on the line), they change the FT shooter to another player who wasn't close enough to the fouler to have been fouled.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Channeling my inner BillyMac.
They can based on rule 2-13-2a: 1. Determine who shall attempt a free throw(s) when there is uncertainty.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Exactly. Which is why I'm wondering how it happened?!?! Once there's ANY doubt about the free throw shooter, they should've gone to the monitor to figure it out. Did they not do this?
|
|
|||
They did not...and it pretty obvious who was fouled....the guy went flying after being shoved out of the way so the fouler had great rebounding position.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tripping | zm1283 | Football | 5 | Sun Oct 23, 2011 08:45pm |
Tripping from Behind | Freddy | Basketball | 45 | Tue Dec 14, 2010 05:28pm |
Tripping? | Eastshire | Soccer | 1 | Fri Aug 27, 2010 08:39am |
Tripping | wrwom | Basketball | 24 | Mon Dec 01, 2008 09:10pm |
Tripping | Suudy | Football | 10 | Tue Oct 11, 2005 04:58am |