Duke/UNC

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

As we've discussed before, however, this case play contradicts the actual rule, 5-2-1.

I assert that it doesn't. The way I read 5-2-1, there is no contradiction at all. If you have two ways to read it and one generates a contradiction and the other one doesn't that should tell you something about the contradictory interpretation.

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Does it matter that the ball in the A.R. is a pass, while the game situation was a try?

Once the ball clearly misses, is it still a try? If it can no longer be goaltending, it is no longer a try.