I need closure

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

These are all fouls called in the frontcourt and "going long".

C tableside calls foul + ball to be put in play tableside = C becomes C opposite table.

C tableside calls foul + ball to be put in play opposite table = C become New Lead opposite table.

C opposite table calls foul + ball to be put in play tableside = C remains C opposite table.

C opposite table calls foul + ball to be put in play opposite table = C becomes New Lead opposite table.

Not true, at least here (and where fullor30 works).

The old L / new T administers all throw-ins in the BC. The other officials just slide down the court but stay on their own side (table or opposite) to be C and L as required.

So,

1) C becomes L tableside ("bump and run")
2) C becomes C tableside
3) same as above
4) same as above ("bump and run")

[tref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Not true, at least here (and where fullor30 works).

The old L / new T administers all throw-ins in the BC. The other officials just slide down the court but stay on their own side (table or opposite) to be C and L as required.

So,

1) C becomes L tableside ("bump and run")
2) C becomes C tableside
3) same as above
4) same as above ("bump and run")

The calling official doesnt go opposite when going long?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by tref

The calling official doesnt go opposite when going long?

No. It's treated just the same as a violation. Would you have the calling official go opposite on a travel call?

[tref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

No. It's treated just the same as a violation. Would you have the calling official go opposite on a travel call?

Nope, just goes to show how much things are different depending on where one officiates.
Here we go opposite after each call in HS like NCAA-M.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by tref

Nope, just goes to show how much things are different depending on where one officiates.
Here we go opposite after each call in HS like NCAA-M.

I meant the question as something an official here should ask him/herself when trying to fiugre out where to go.

In general, the calling official goes tableside.

It's trumped by the "old L / new T administers all throwins in the BC" procedure.

[tref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I meant the question as something an official here should ask him/herself when trying to fiugre out where to go.

In general, the calling official goes tableside.

It's trumped by the "old L / new T administers all throwins in the BC" procedure.

Got it. We have that procedure as well, its just that the calling official will never be the new tableside T.

[PG_Ref]

Originally Posted by tref

Got it. We have that procedure as well, its just that the calling official will never be the new tableside T.

Also keep in mind that NFHS and IAABO mechanics differ slightly on this. And NFHS stipulates no switch if there are no foul shots to be taken at the other end.

[refiator]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I meant the question as something an official here should ask him/herself when trying to fiugre out where to go.

In general, the calling official goes tableside.

It's trumped by the "old L / new T administers all throwins in the BC" procedure.

Yep.

[Indianaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Not true, at least here (and where fullor30 works).

The old L / new T administers all throw-ins in the BC. The other officials just slide down the court but stay on their own side (table or opposite) to be C and L as required.

So,

1) C becomes L tableside ("bump and run")
2) C becomes C tableside
3) same as above
4) same as above ("bump and run")

Perfect and precise