![]() |
I need closure
Several threads on this already I believe but perused a couple and couldn't find definitive answer.
Please list switch scenarios going long as it relates to C reporting foul. . Dazed and confused. |
These are all fouls called in the frontcourt and "going long".
C tableside calls foul + ball to be put in play tableside = C becomes C opposite table. C tableside calls foul + ball to be put in play opposite table = C become New Lead opposite table. C opposite table calls foul + ball to be put in play tableside = C remains C opposite table. C opposite table calls foul + ball to be put in play opposite table = C becomes New Lead opposite table. |
Quote:
3.4.5 There is no switch under the following circumstances: a. A foul in the backcourt going to the frontcourt with no free throws. This is treated the same as a violation in the backcourt. A "bump and run" may be necessary. b. When the calling official is already the tableside trail. c. When the tableside Center makes a call in which the ball will be taken out of bounds opposite the table staying in the frontcourt. This should be a rare situation, as this would likely be outside the Center's PCA. |
Quote:
Thanks! goofed last scenario last night, slid over as lead to opposite table and made C stay table side. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The old L / new T administers all throw-ins in the BC. The other officials just slide down the court but stay on their own side (table or opposite) to be C and L as required. So, 1) C becomes L tableside ("bump and run") 2) C becomes C tableside 3) same as above 4) same as above ("bump and run") |
Quote:
Is this the NCAA-M mechanics? Cause around here, we do HS games the way Bob posted (always listen to Bob). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here we go opposite after each call in HS like NCAA-M. |
Quote:
In general, the calling official goes tableside. It's trumped by the "old L / new T administers all throwins in the BC" procedure. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14am. |