|
|||
That being said, I'm still confused. Why would the official report a flagrant 1 to the table, then go to the monitor? Especially when the rule book specifically discourages officials from using replay when there's a reasonable confidence that an illegal elbow did occur. I thought you go to the monitor to determine IF a flagrant 1 occurred that you didn't catch, or to determine if you need to upgrade a flagrant 1 to a flagrant 2. Is there anything on that play that makes it seem like the foul could be upgraded?
On top of that, why handcuff your officials by not allowing them to reverse a call when it's determined by replay that no contact actually occurred? It's just a really weird situation. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flagrant foul/flagrant technical | splitveer | Basketball | 6 | Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm |
Question: FSU vs Clemson | DTQ_Blue | Baseball | 5 | Mon May 05, 2008 10:27am |
Duke vs. Clemson | IREFU2 | Basketball | 13 | Fri Feb 23, 2007 02:52pm |
Duke/Clemson timing error | Toadman15241 | Basketball | 100 | Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:31am |
Virginia vs. Clemson | IREFU2 | Basketball | 15 | Sun Jan 28, 2007 06:53pm |