![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Don't trust the rule knowledge of those commenting on Youtube videos, especially one like this.
As others have said, one flagrant foul in NFHS is a DQ. Many fans, coaches and even some officials will call a foul flagrant when they really mean intentional because the NBA (and recently now NCAA) use that terminology.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
|
No.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
|
Yup, although it's doubtful a coach would let a player who's doing that stay in.
__________________
Yom HaShoah |
|
|||
|
Then, It's A Much Different Story ...
Unless, of course, your the varsity coach of the Connell High School basketball team.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
|
In theory yes but I think by the third, I am highly considering upgrading it to a flagrant.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
|
There it is. I've never been in this position, but a second intentional foul, depending on severity of contact, would probably warrant a flagrant from me.
|
|
|||
|
The responses here are hinting at 1 feature of the rules and 1 feature of how the game is called:
Rules: by rule, there is no limit on the number of intentional personal or intentional technical fouls that can be called on a player, as such. The standard limit of 5 personal or 2 technical fouls in a game still result in disqualification. Calling it: an intentional personal foul is called when either a player uses excessive force or neutralizes an opponent's obvious advantage. For the latter, few will seriously consider "upgrading" to a flagrant. If a player has gotten an INT for excessive force, many would consider that a kind of "warning" to the player and coach that this level of force is not appropriate for the game. A second or third such foul would reflect the player's or coach's unwillingness to adjust to the game. Some would consider persistently excessive force sufficiently "violent" to fall under the definition of a flagrant foul. Others would say that a foul is a foul: it's either INT or flagrant, and can't be called based on the game situation.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
If any one cares in FIBA a player gets ejected once they accumulate 2 unsporting ( FIBA term for Intentional) fouls. They must then go to the dressing room or leave the building. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ejection | umpire99 | Baseball | 4 | Tue Sep 28, 2010 01:03pm |
| My 1ST Ejection | PFISTO | Baseball | 49 | Wed May 16, 2007 06:26pm |
| ejection | ggk | Baseball | 9 | Tue Jun 06, 2006 05:08pm |
| Ejection | JoeyMac323 | Basketball | 7 | Mon Nov 08, 2004 08:19pm |
| My first ejection! | buddha69 | Softball | 20 | Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:51am |