The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:58am
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Sorry i meant intentional. I edited my OP. Do two intentional fouls equal ejection?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:59am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
Sorry i meant intentional. I edited my OP. Do two intentional fouls equal ejection?
No.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:59am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
No, only technicals are two and done.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:04pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
No, only technicals are two and done.
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:05pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?
In theory.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:05pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?
Yup, although it's doubtful a coach would let a player who's doing that stay in.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 06:14pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,381
Then, It's A Much Different Story ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
Yup, although it's doubtful a coach would let a player who's doing that stay in.
Unless, of course, your the varsity coach of the Connell High School basketball team.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:05pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?
In theory yes but I think by the third, I am highly considering upgrading it to a flagrant.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:19pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
In theory yes but I think by the third, I am highly considering upgrading it to a flagrant.
There it is. I've never been in this position, but a second intentional foul, depending on severity of contact, would probably warrant a flagrant from me.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
Last week in a game between Golden State Warriors and the Orlando Magic, the Warriors were Intentionally fouling Dwight Howard (grabbing him without the ball) to put him on the free throw line (he had 39 attempts). From the highlights that I saw, even though they were Intentional, they was nothing that would raise to the level Flagrant, if it would have been in a high school. So just because there is many intentional foul, that does not mean you escalate to flagrant fouls.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?
The responses here are hinting at 1 feature of the rules and 1 feature of how the game is called:

Rules: by rule, there is no limit on the number of intentional personal or intentional technical fouls that can be called on a player, as such. The standard limit of 5 personal or 2 technical fouls in a game still result in disqualification.

Calling it: an intentional personal foul is called when either a player uses excessive force or neutralizes an opponent's obvious advantage. For the latter, few will seriously consider "upgrading" to a flagrant.

If a player has gotten an INT for excessive force, many would consider that a kind of "warning" to the player and coach that this level of force is not appropriate for the game. A second or third such foul would reflect the player's or coach's unwillingness to adjust to the game. Some would consider persistently excessive force sufficiently "violent" to fall under the definition of a flagrant foul.

Others would say that a foul is a foul: it's either INT or flagrant, and can't be called based on the game situation.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 16, 2012, 02:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
the responses here are hinting at 1 feature of the rules and 1 feature of how the game is called:

Rules: By rule, there is no limit on the number of intentional personal or intentional technical fouls that can be called on a player, as such. The standard limit of 5 personal or 2 technical fouls in a game still result in disqualification.

Calling it: An intentional personal foul is called when either a player uses excessive force or neutralizes an opponent's obvious advantage. For the latter, few will seriously consider "upgrading" to a flagrant.

If a player has gotten an int for excessive force, many would consider that a kind of "warning" to the player and coach that this level of force is not appropriate for the game. A second or third such foul would reflect the player's or coach's unwillingness to adjust to the game. Some would consider persistently excessive force sufficiently "violent" to fall under the definition of a flagrant foul.

Others would say that a foul is a foul: It's either int or flagrant, and can't be called based on the game situation.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 17, 2012, 04:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So in theory you can have 5 intentionals in a game?

If any one cares in FIBA a player gets ejected once they accumulate 2 unsporting ( FIBA term for Intentional) fouls. They must then go to the dressing room or leave the building.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ejection umpire99 Baseball 4 Tue Sep 28, 2010 01:03pm
My 1ST Ejection PFISTO Baseball 49 Wed May 16, 2007 06:26pm
ejection ggk Baseball 9 Tue Jun 06, 2006 05:08pm
Ejection JoeyMac323 Basketball 7 Mon Nov 08, 2004 08:19pm
My first ejection! buddha69 Softball 20 Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:51am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1