Correctable error quandry

[bob jenkins]

The ruling is correct. "Correcttable error" is not equivalent to "REDO". Fix it, the pick up where you left off.

In the first case, "fix it" means cancel FTs in error.

In the second case, it means "let the right person shoot the FTs".

[Camron Rust]

There is some onus on A to not take unmerited FTs. By taking them, they give up the right to a throwin once the FTs are taken and play has resumed even if the FTs subsequently get canceled.

[BayStateRef]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

There is some onus on A to not take unmerited FTs. By taking them, they give up the right to a throwin once the FTs are taken and play has resumed even if the FTs get canceled.

By that reasoning, there is even more onus on A1 not to take the free throws since he was not fouled. But his team is not "punished" the way it is in the first scenario. And if it is the home table that gave the officials the bad information...and the visitors lose both the free throws and the ball?

Either way, the rules don't speak to "onus."

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

By that reasoning, there is even more onus on A1 not to take the free throws since he was not fouled. But his team is not "punished" the way it is in the first scenario. And if it is the home table that gave the officials the bad information...and the visitors lose both the free throws and the ball?

Either way, the rules don't speak to "onus."

A1 taking FTs due A3 can be penalized with a T if it is deem to be deliberate....certainly an equitable punishment. No matter which CE scenario you come up with, the team that seems to be getting an unfair advantage through the error risk ending up worse off than if they had spoken up and made sure it was right to start with.

Maybe they don't mention "onus' in the rules but there is a reason behind most rules. They're usually not created in a vacuum.

[Toren]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

A1 taking FTs due A3 can be penalized with a T if it is deem to be deliberate....certainly an equitable punishment. No matter which CE scenario you come up with, the team that seems to be getting an unfair advantage through the error risk ending up worse off than if they had spoken up and made sure it was right to start with.

Maybe they don't mention "onus' in the rules but there is a reason behind most rules. They're usually not created in a vacuum.

Correctable errors are errors caused by officials. These are our errors. If A1 is told to take some free throws, how many of us would be open to him telling us "my teammate was the one fouled"? So there is no onus on the player to inform us of our mistake.

It is our job, and that's why we get paid handsomely, to know who fouled, who got fouled, what time is on the clock, if we are shooting bonus free throws, if we are in the double bonus, etc etc.

If you called a Technical on a player for deliberately taking free throws that an official gave to him, then you are just compounding the issue. It is our mistake to begin with, fix it, move on.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Toren

Correctable errors are errors caused by officials. These are our errors.

Some of them are caused by officials. Usually, they're caused by table officials. We can only act on the information given.

[Toren]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Some of them are caused by officials. Usually, they're caused by table officials. We can only act on the information given.

I don't agree, in what situation would a table official be completely responsible?

We didn't shoot the 1 and 1 because the score board only had 6 fouls listed...why didn't we notice when foul #4 wasn't added to the board? That's our error

We shot the 1 and 1 when there was only 6 team fouls but the board is showing 7 team fouls...why didn't we notice that when foul #3 was reported, it jumped to foul #5.

In all correctable errors, the responsibility is ours. I will not pardon myself. I have been lucky enough to not have to deal with a correctable error yet, but when it happens I will be looking long and hard at tape to figure out where I lost concentration.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Toren

Correctable errors are errors caused by officials. These are our errors. If A1 is told to take some free throws, how many of us would be open to him telling us "my teammate was the one fouled"? So there is no onus on the player to inform us of our mistake.

It is our job, and that's why we get paid handsomely, to know who fouled, who got fouled, what time is on the clock, if we are shooting bonus free throws, if we are in the double bonus, etc etc.

If you called a Technical on a player for deliberately taking free throws that an official gave to him, then you are just compounding the issue. It is our mistake to begin with, fix it, move on.

Usually, CE's are not caused by the officials. They're caused by the scorekeeper providing the official incorrect information or not providing information...they indicated 6 fouls only to realize it was 7 (or 9 vs 10). Those the the most common CE's. The ramifications of the CE are such that each team risks losing something if it is not done right to start with. It is beneficial to the teams to keep their own stats so they can point out the discrepancy when it happens before the CE occurs.

The wrong shooter situation, which is probably the rarest CE situation, is usually either through confusion when more than one player may have been fouled or after a timeout when a team may try to switch shooters hoping the officials didn't notice (but they act like it was confusion). I've never called the T, I've told the right shooter to get to the line before we get to the point of having to issue the T.

[Toren]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

The wrong shooter situation, which is probably the rarest CE situation, is usually either through confusion when more than one player may have been fouled or after a timeout when a team may try to switch shooters hoping the officials didn't notice (but they act like it was confusion). I've never called the T, I've told the right shooter to get to the line before we get to the point of having to issue the T.

This situation can be prevented 100% of the time. Whenever the officials don't know or lost concentration or whatever, is when we screw it up. If we communicate who fouled and who should be shooting to our partners, then we have no confusion.

This is a much different scenario then a team trying to deliberately switch the shooter.