The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Ha! The 2 fisted foul signal!

Looked like a block to me.
I had a charge. Just for my knowledge, what part of that made you go block?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:30pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballgame99 View Post
I had a charge. Just for my knowledge, what part of that made you go block?
I have a block too...I have the defender moving forward after the offensive player is airborne and thus no LGP.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:48pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Block, IMO. B1 moving into A1. But really close, even in replay.

And I agree with the "two calls don't make a double call" philosophy. However, I don't know the NCAAM rule on that, without looking it up. I know the NCAAW version of those situations involves doing a sensible thing, by rule, and conferencing about which call the crew wants to go with of the two (or three). For those that subscribe to the the "one official has a block, one official has a charge, therefore we have to administer a blarge" theory: When one official has a foul, and one official has a travel, should we administer a fravel? I think common sense should dictate that officials talk about what they each saw and called and why, and then go from there. (I realize some rule sets do not allow for that in some situations, however.)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 391
Is there anything wrong (let's talk college and/or NFHS) with the L and T getting together real quick to discuss what the right call should have been? Obviously this is why we should have eye contact on a double whistle, but how is this double whistle any different than me whispering to a partner that I saw someone else tip the ball out of bounds?

Obviously the two preliminary signals contradict each other, but what harm comes of a quick discussion?
__________________
Dan R.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:20pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danvrapp View Post
Is there anything wrong (let's talk college and/or NFHS) with the L and T getting together real quick to discuss what the right call should have been? Obviously this is why we should have eye contact on a double whistle, but how is this double whistle any different than me whispering to a partner that I saw someone else tip the ball out of bounds?

Obviously the two preliminary signals contradict each other, but what harm comes of a quick discussion?
You do not need to have a discussion to make this call and I think that would be inappropriate. At least not other than making eye contact and making a call. All this will do is bring on more debate as to why the call was made IMO.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 391
Given a double whistle with NO prelim signal(s), I agree. But with the prelim signal(s) I would think you save more face (and have a better chance of getting the call right!) if you conference real quick.

And I'm surprised no one brought this up yet...is the T obligated to buy the beer after the game?
__________________
Dan R.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:28pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danvrapp View Post
Given a double whistle with NO prelim signal(s), I agree. But with the prelim signal(s) I would think you save more face (and have a better chance of getting the call right!) if you conference real quick.

And I'm surprised no one brought this up yet...is the T obligated to buy the beer after the game?
The problem is the rules do not support your position. This rule is exactly the same a the NCAA level as it is at the NF level.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:37pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danvrapp View Post
Given a double whistle with NO prelim signal(s), I agree. But with the prelim signal(s) I would think you save more face (and have a better chance of getting the call right!) if you conference real quick.

And I'm surprised no one brought this up yet...is the T obligated to buy the beer after the game?
The only time you can get together under NCAA-M rules after conflicting signals on a block/charge play is if the play involves the restricted area. Otherwise you're stuck with a double foul.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,022
Since I'm not as well-versed in 3-man, can someone give some insight into whose call this should be? I mean, I know it's in an intersecting place on the court in terms of coverage, but whose primary is it? Seems like the play originated in the T's area, but the secondary defender is coming from the L's area.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 15, 2011, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballgame99 View Post
I had a charge. Just for my knowledge, what part of that made you go block?
I saw the same as APG: defender moves into airborne shooter, thus forfeiting LGP.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
West Virginia AAA State Championship Game Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Football 1 Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:47pm
BLARGE rears it's ugly head - Baylor vs K State DLH17 Basketball 9 Wed Mar 17, 2010 09:04am
Florida State/Mississippi State Tech theboys Basketball 3 Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:25am
Okla State / K State Head Butt Larks Basketball 1 Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:26pm
State Government Defeated in Attempt to Control State Association mikesears Football 14 Wed Apr 20, 2005 07:35am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1