The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Player control on a throw in? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/83034-player-control-throw.html)

billyu2 Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 798489)
Player control foul.



It matters, ever so slightly. Are you going with the hand behind the head signal (player control), or the one hand punch signal (team control)?



Here in the Land that is round at both ends and hi in the middle we use the same signal for both: hand behind the head, followed by the directional signal.

APG Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 798544)
Slightly. Are you going with the hand behind the head signal (player control), or the one hand punch signal (team control)?

Do you indicate a block signal when the foul was really a push? "They're penalized EXACTLY the same".

Do you indicate an illegal dribble signal when the violation was really a travel? "They're penalized EXACTLY the same".

I know that these are nit-picking, "academic", questions, but isn't one function of the Forum to educate?

Except in this case, if you punched or do the stupid player control signal, you're still technically right with either...you know if you want to go that route.

APG Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoInZebra (Post 798541)
A thrower reaches out to clear space....this sounds intentional not common and therefore not PC.

Why does it have to be intentional? Players try to clear out space all the time and we're not trying the X's up. In fact, I'd say that 9/10, if this situation were to actually present itself, it wouldn't be an intentional foul.

Camron Rust Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 798544)
Slightly. Are you going with the hand behind the head signal (player control), or the one hand punch signal (team control)?

Do you indicate a block signal when the foul was really a push? "They're penalized EXACTLY the same".

Do you indicate an illegal dribble signal when the violation was really a travel? "They're penalized EXACTLY the same".

I know that these are nit-picking, "academic", questions, but isn't one function of the Forum to educate?

A signal is not a penalty.

Camron Rust Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1 (Post 798547)
And the free throws are why Snaqs is correct. An airborne shooter is not covered by the team control foul rule. Without the player control foul, a "try, release, crash" could result in a 1-and-1 for the defender. So even with the team control foul at your disposal, you still need the player control foul.

Still the same penalty for the two fouls whenever they can currently be called. And if they merged them into one, the airborne shooter exception would be blended into the team control foul.

Scrapper1 Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 798596)
Still the same penalty for the two fouls whenever they can currently be called.

But that's not what you said earlier.

Quote:

And if they merged them into one, the airborne shooter exception would be blended into the team control foul.
Perhaps, but again, that's not what you said. You said:

Quote:

Once the team control foul was instituted, the player control foul really became unnecessary.
And not to be overly anal, but that's just not true. Even after the team control foul was instituted, there was a situation remaining that was a player control foul, which was NOT a team control foul. That's my only point, and it's the point that I think Snaq was making when he correctly said "Almost".

Adam Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:43pm

Scrapper is right. That was my point.

Camron Rust Tue Nov 15, 2011 03:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1 (Post 798599)
But that's not what you said earlier.


Perhaps, but again, that's not what you said. You said:

And not to be overly anal, but that's just not true. Even after the team control foul was instituted, there was a situation remaining that was a player control foul, which was NOT a team control foul. That's my only point, and it's the point that I think Snaq was making when he correctly said "Almost".

And my point was that splitting them into two separate names serves no benefit because the very same exception that is tacked on the the player control foul for an airborne shooter could just as easily be tacked onto the team control foul. Having both is not necessary at all. The PENALTY remains the same

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Nov 15, 2011 04:03pm

Not in the land of the OhioHSAA.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by billyu2 (Post 798573)
[/B]

Here in the Land that is round at both ends and hi in the middle we use the same signal for both: hand behind the head, followed by the directional signal.


No we do NOT use both signals in Buckeye Land. What the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Chairman (an OhioHSAA Adminstrator who shall remain nameless) has ruled: That the OhioHSAA will not follow the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Signals Chart concerning the correct signal for Team Control Fouls. This decision was made at the start of the 2009-10 year, the first year the TCF signal was added to the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Signals Chart.

The OhioHSAA wants its officials to use only Signal #34 for all Team Control Fouls, both Player Control Fouls and non-PCF TCFs. The NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Chairman's reasoning for this blatant deviation from the Signals Chart is that and I quote: "It would be confusing to the Scorer." :eek:

I am going to stop now.

MTD, Sr.


P.S. To my knowledge, the OhioHSAA did not seek permission of the NFHS to deviate from the Official Signals Chart.

billyu2 Tue Nov 15, 2011 04:32pm

slow down, read again carefully
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 798643)
No we do NOT use both signals in Buckeye Land. What the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Chairman (an OhioHSAA Adminstrator who shall remain nameless) has ruled: That the OhioHSAA will not follow the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Signals Chart concerning the correct signal for Team Control Fouls. This decision was made at the start of the 2009-10 year, the first year the TCF signal was added to the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Signals Chart.

The OhioHSAA wants its officials to use only Signal #34 for all Team Control Fouls, both Player Control Fouls and non-PCF TCFs. The NFHS Basketball Rules Committee Chairman's reasoning for this blatant deviation from the Signals Chart is that and I quote: "It would be confusing to the Scorer." :eek:

I am going to stop now.




P.S. To my knowledge, the OhioHSAA did not seek permission of the NFHS to deviate from the Official Signals Chart.

Mark, didn't say OHSAA uses both. I said we use the same signal for both (PC andTC) hand behind the head which is, as you said, signal #34. (for all those officials who memorize signal #'s)

Adam Tue Nov 15, 2011 08:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by billyu2 (Post 798655)
Mark, didn't say OHSAA uses both. I said we use the same signal for both (PC andTC) hand behind the head which is, as you said, signal #34. (for all those officials who memorize signal #'s)

Which is a deviation.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Nov 15, 2011 09:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by billyu2 (Post 798655)
Mark, didn't say OHSAA uses both. I said we use the same signal for both (PC andTC) hand behind the head which is, as you said, signal #34. (for all those officials who memorize signal #'s)


DOH!!

MTD, Sr.


P.S. But I am sure you get the feeling that I am not happy with a certain OhioHSAA Administrator who shall not be named. :D

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rex 876 (Post 798701)
Thanks for nothing dude.

I am trying to get clarification.

I don't believe there is player control for a throw in, just team control.

Do you have an opinion? a rule reference?
http://www.mboxmusic.info/jh2.jpg
http://www.mboxmusic.info/2.jpg


Rex:

Read Post #29 of this thread. I wrote it and will answer your question.

MTD, Sr.

Adam Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 798709)
Rex:

Read Post #29 of this thread. I wrote it and will answer your question.

MTD, Sr.

Mark, it's spam. He just quoted terrapin to post his web link.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 798720)
Mark, it's spam. He just quoted terrapin to post his web link.


DOH!!! :confused: See what happens when you become a sexagenaian. LOL

MTD, Sr.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1