Invoking the R privilege

Adam · #1 (**permalink**) Wed Nov 09, 2011, 10:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indianaref

If after a brief chat with him and he stands firm with B23, make a quick switch with him and let him stand table side to discuss things with the coach.

I don't like this. If he wants to switch, go ahead. If not, you're just starting the bus.

Besides, you've got FTs, so he'll be going opposite table anyway.

If you've offered him info, and he sticks with his call, you have to assume he called something different than you thought. Unless 23 was in the backcourt or something.

jdmara · #2 (**permalink**) Wed Nov 09, 2011, 10:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I don't like this. If he wants to switch, go ahead. If not, you're just starting the bus.

Besides, you've got FTs, so he'll be going opposite table anyway.

If you've offered him info, and he sticks with his call, you have to assume he called something different than you thought. Unless 23 was in the backcourt or something.

Some states have made the terrible decision to have the calling official stay tableside. I thought about this as well. I would not switch if he's opposite tableside.

-Josh

APG · #3 (**permalink**) Wed Nov 09, 2011, 11:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdmara

Some states have made the terrible decision to have the calling official stay tableside. I thought about this as well. I would not switch if he's opposite tableside.

-Josh

In Texas, we'd be tableside anyhow after reporting...I personally like going tableside and glad we've been doing it for awhile.

Adam · #4 (**permalink**) Wed Nov 09, 2011, 11:28am

I also like going tableside, but there's no way I'm tossing my partner into the street on this play. If he wants to switch and chat, I'll go along, but if not, no way I'm initiating it.

BktBallRef · #5 (**permalink**) Wed Nov 09, 2011, 08:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdmara

Some states have made the terrible decision to have the calling official stay tableside.

Some states? Actually, the NFHS mechanic is to stay tableside. Also, in 3 man, the calling official stays tableside.

So why is that a terrible decision?

Adam · #6 (**permalink**) Thu Nov 10, 2011, 12:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Some states? Actually, the NFHS mechanic is to stay tableside. Also, in 3 man, the calling official stays tableside.

So why is that a terrible decision?

I believe IAABO has not made that choice; but I agree that it's not a horrible decision.

JRutledge · #7 (**permalink**) Thu Nov 10, 2011, 12:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I believe IAABO has not made that choice; but I agree that it's not a horrible decision.

Six in one hand, half a dozen in the other. I do not think it really matters either way.

Peace

SAK · #8 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 11, 2011, 08:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I believe IAABO has not made that choice; but I agree that it's not a horrible decision.

I believe that it is a great decision. Why have the coach yell all the way across the floor because, arbatrarly and by old mechanic, we would rotate on every foul. Makes sense to have the calling official trail table side to be able to ANSWER A QUESTION from the coach. If it gets to be too much the official can move away from the coach and should move away and more onto the court if it becomes a hostile situation. I think that NCAAW have it correct as well NFHS. I have also been told in our rules meeting that if we belive it will be confrientational, we have the option of being trail opposit table. However in this situation I would be table side.