![]() |
|
|
|||
Jay R; If your question implies that Team A was passing the ball from their backcourt and A3 jumps from the frontcourt catches the pass and then lands in Team A's backcourt - a backcourt violation has occurred. A3 has front court status when he jumped; when he touches the ball it is deemed to have achieved frontcourt status. When he lands in the backcourt the violation has occurred. The three conditions for a backcourt violation have occurred, Team A control of the ball, Team A last to touch in the frontcourt, Team A first to touch in the backcourt.
Slightly different scenario, if A3 intercepted an opponent's pass he could jump from the frontcourt gain control while airborne and legally land in the backcourt. FIBA made this rule change (or exception if you will) in 2008. |
|
|||
Quote:
Ciao |
|
|||
eg-Italy,
I'll respectfully disagree. The frontcourt status of a player catching a pass from his teammate while airborne and then landing in the backcourt is a violation. As evidence I offer these plays from the 2011 CABO interpretations manual (all have been reviewed and approved by FIBA) as well as from the 2010 FIBA interpretations manual In Team A’s backcourt, A1 makes a throw-in pass to A3 who leaps from Team A’s frontcourt, catches the ball and then lands in Team A’s backcourt. Has A3committed a violation for illegally returning the ball to the backcourt? Yes. A3 does not establish a new control for Team A which was already in control of the ball. © Copyright Canadian Association of Basketball Officials, April 2011 Example 3: Thrower-in A4 in his frontcourt attempts a pass to A3. A3 jumps from his backcourt, catches the ball while airborne and lands (a) With both feet in his backcourt. (b) Straddling the centre line. (c) Straddling the centre line and then dribbles or passes the ball to his backcourt. Interpretation: Team A violation. Thrower-in A4 has established the team A control of the ball in the frontcourt before A3 caught the ball while airborne and landed in his backcourt. In all cases A3 has illegally returned the ball to the backcourt. FIBA Official Interpretations 2010/LK |
|
|||
eg-italy,
ref3309 is right, that play is in the 2010 FIBA Interpretations and it is a backcourt violation. Which brings me back to my original point. I don't see the consistency. When you jump with both feet and catch the ball, it's a violation. If you have one foot on the floor, it's legal. American rule sets are more consistent. |
|
|||
Quote:
Ciao |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Example 3 you're citing has nothing to do with this case, as the ball already has frontcourt status when it's in the hands of A4. Ciao |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For FIBA officials (here we go again) | Jay R | Basketball | 16 | Tue Aug 24, 2010 08:17pm |
Question for my fellow FIBA officials | Jay R | Basketball | 22 | Thu Nov 19, 2009 02:09pm |
FIBA front and backcourt status, and the over and back rule | JugglingReferee | Basketball | 5 | Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:53pm |
FIBA Officials | eyad mohamad | Basketball | 17 | Mon Sep 11, 2006 02:59pm |
Question for FIBA officials | Jimgolf | Basketball | 11 | Mon Sep 04, 2006 03:50pm |