Dual violations on first of two FT's

[JRutledge]

Originally posted by Mregor


The FT also ends when it is apparent that it will not be successful. You don't have to wait until it touches a player or the floor. I would not call a double violation unless the B player went in extremely early. I'd lean more to blowing it dead because of the missed rim.

Mregor

Well this is where judgement comes in. You have to determine what happen first if they did not happen practically at the same time. If you feel that B1 came in the lane first, then you could have a double violation. If you feel the ball would have missed first or it was obvious to everyone, then maybe you can kind of look the other way on the actions of B1. Either way call what obviously happen and what you can sell.

Peace