| Scrapper1 |
Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:08am |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheway
(Post 766933)
IMO two-hand works best be efficient be calm but keep the game moving
|
Can you explain to me how two-hand reporting keeps the game moving better than one-hand reporting? Are you suggesting that one-hand reporting takes significantly longer than two-hand reporting? (And by "significantly", I mean more than a tenth of a second.) Perhaps you find that one-hand reporting causes so much confusion that you have to re-report the number significantly more often (more than once per season) than when using two hands?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheway
(Post 768009)
im looking at bigger and better things (jr college and up) so I dont care what my Dist director says im going to do it most efficiently.;)
|
I know you haven't been here long, so I apologize if I am seriously mis-reading your comments. But your statement above sounds so arrogant to me, I'm honestly taken aback. If you take a game, then do that game. Don't prep for some better assignment that you're angling for.
(BTW -- I see the "winkie" after your post, but I can't tell what that's supposed to mean.)
There's nothing wrong with having goals. Almost everyone would like do games at the "next level", whatever that level is. But when you work a game, use the rules and mechanics for that level of game. Using incorrect signals or mechanics (or areas of coverage) can be confusing to your partner or table personnel.
Do the game you're assigned to do. Work on the other stuff at a college camp. |
