NCAAM Final Game

[rulesmaven]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Did anyone see the blatant 2-hand shove foul with around 6 minutes remaining? Napier, IIRC, was going up for a loose ball (after Butler knocked away that ill-advised 35' bounce pass),

Here's the play -- sorry about the content of the web site surrounding it. I think that's Lamb, not Napier. Still, weird to take a pass there. He looks like he's looking right at it.

NCAA Championship Game 2011: Watch Horrible Non-Call in Ugly Title Game | Bleacher Report

[APG]

Originally Posted by rulesmaven

Here's the play -- sorry about the content of the web site surrounding it. I think that's Lamb, not Napier. Still, weird to take a pass there. He looks like he's looking right at it.

NCAA Championship Game 2011: Watch Horrible Non-Call in Ugly Title Game | Bleacher Report

Only 2 minutes too slow

[APG]

Was to post this play:

[Camron Rust]

RSBQ: That is usually called in most games. Not sure why it wasn't.

Incidental Contact: I don't really see anything other than an ugly play.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Here's the play in question:
Foul?

Definitely a foul. Could lead to dirty play.

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

RSBQ

Is this a RSBQ play that needs to be gotten...what about the contact by the dribbler at the end of the drive?

I think this one has to be called.

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Incidental Contact Butler

Pass.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Was to post this play:

YouTube - Incidental Contact Butler vs. UConn

From this angle you can't see if A1 pushed B1 or if B1 just stumbled on his own.

[Nevadaref]

I stated in the chat room last night that Butler need to shoot 38% from 3pt range in order to win. They were 9/33 = 27%. Had they made four of those 3pt shots which they missed they would have been 13/33 = 39% and scored 12 more points. Guess what? They lost by 12.

So I was darn close. They would have needed to shoot a bit over 39% and that would have only gotten them even, so they would have also needed to make one of the several FTs which they missed. Overall, not a bad prediction.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I stated in the chat room last night that Butler need to shoot 38% from 3pt range in order to win. They were 9/33 = 27%. Had they made four of those 3pt shots which they missed they would have been 13/33 = 39% and scored 12 more points. Guess what? They lost by 12.

So I was darn close. They would have needed to shoot a bit over 39% and that would have only gotten them even, so they would have also needed to make one of the several FTs which they missed. Overall, not a bad prediction.

Although your math works out coincidentally, no team shooting 18.8% from the floor deserves to win, much less on that stage.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Although your math works out coincidentally, no team shooting 18.8% from the floor deserves to win, much less on that stage.

For that matter, neither team deserved to win last night...they both stunk it up.

I was hoping the AP pollsters would have the guts and not put UConn/Butler #1/#2....particularly Butler. One voter did and voted Ohio State #1 but the rest were mindless lemmings. That poll is basically a sham if anyone thinks Butler is the #2 team in the country......top 20 maybe, but no where near #2. There were a dozen teams in other corners of the brackets they didn't beat that were so obviously better. They got a few lucky breaks to get to be in the game and nothing more.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I stated in the chat room last night that Butler need to shoot 38% from 3pt range in order to win. They were 9/33 = 27%. Had they made four of those 3pt shots which they missed they would have been 13/33 = 39% and scored 12 more points. Guess what? They lost by 12.

So I was darn close. They would have needed to shoot a bit over 39% and that would have only gotten them even, so they would have also needed to make one of the several FTs which they missed. Overall, not a bad prediction.

Is this one of those predictions where you said a few dozen things, pick the one that was closest to being right in hindsight, and only mention that one?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Having a lucky run coming through one of the easiest brackets with such an abysmal final performance doesn't mean you're good, just played above your head, had a few lucky breaks, and finally came back to earth. Anyone who claims they're the 2nd best team in the land is delusional. They're not even top 10.

If we were to use your arguments alone, there would be several teams equally deserving of the #2, if not more deserving.

What about a team that beat a #5, #2 and the overall #1 and only lost to the champion? (No I don't think they're 2nd best ether but more so than Butler).

What about another team that beat another #4 and a #1 and lost to UConn? They have a good argument too.

Butler was a lot better last year. They overachieved this year. There are many arguments that could be made for at least 4-5 teams that are more deserving..

Camron, do you work for the BCS?

Butler proved it on the court. They won the darn games, until the final one. The other teams didn't. They are a deserving #2.

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Is this one of those predictions where you said a few dozen things, pick the one that was closest to being right in hindsight, and only mention that one?

Well, I'm not Liam's mum!