Int

[grunewar]

In a HTBT moment, if I believe B1 is not making a play on the ball and this is NOT a basketball play, I might call it.

There's probably a lot more INT fouls committed than are actually called......especially at the end of games.

[APG]

I did not think that play in the Arizona v. UConn play was an intentional foul which I think was the play that prompted this question.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

I did not think that play in the Arizona v. UConn play was an intentional foul which I think was the play that prompted this question.

I thought that it should have been.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I thought that it should have been.

I'll get a clip of it later and post it in the discussion thread.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

I'll get a clip of it later and post it in the discussion thread.

And here it is 1/2 day later and still no clip. I'm disappointed.

[APG]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

And here it is 1/2 day later and still no clip. I'm disappointed.

Shut up!

Just channeling my inner JR!

[APG]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

And here it is 1/2 day later and still no clip. I'm disappointed.

For your edification....

2011 NCAAM Sweet 16

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by nevadaref

i thought that it should have been.

+1

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I thought that it should have been.

I thought it was textbook. B1 grabbed the airborne shooter around the waist from behind! I was really surprised that wasn't INT.

[tref]

Originally Posted by mbyron

I thought it was textbook. B1 grabbed the airborne shooter around the waist from behind! I was really surprised that wasn't INT.

Yeah that's what I was saying. I'm aware that the "clear path" rule is an NBA thing, but that fact along with wrapping up an airborne shooter minus a legitimate play on the ball, sold me. There was a double whistle on the play as well.

But hey, its much easier to make calls from the stands/couch than in real game situations...